Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Altas Shrugged to be Filmed
Never Yet Melted bog ^ | 4/27/2006 | jdz

Posted on 04/27/2006 5:02:33 PM PDT by Venator

Variety reports:

Lionsgate has picked up worldwide distribution rights to “Atlas Shrugged” from Howard and Karen Baldwin (Ray), who will produce with John Aglialoro.

As for stars, book provides an ideal role for an actress in lead character Dagny Taggart, so it’s not a stretch to assume Rand enthusiast Angelina Jolie’s name has been brought up. Brad Pitt, also a fan, is rumored to be among the names suggested for lead male character John Galt.

(Excerpt) Read more at neveryetmelted.com ...


TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: angelinajolie; atlasshrugged; aynrand; bradpitt; hollywood; moviedeal

1 posted on 04/27/2006 5:02:35 PM PDT by Venator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Venator

Related (yet different) thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1622673/posts

I sure hope Whoopi Goldberg isn't in it.


2 posted on 04/27/2006 5:04:03 PM PDT by RabidBartender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venator

Can't wait to see how they trash it. Jolie a Rand enthusiast? Right.


3 posted on 04/27/2006 5:05:36 PM PDT by cll (Carthage must be destroyed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RabidBartender
How many times have we heard this? It would've been better if Freddie Silverman had not killed the television project in the 70s/80s(?). It's a bit dated now with the propeller airplanes and that.

Also, to show the whole book on film I would estimate that the film would have to run 15 hours. What would one edit that down to? 10 hours? 12 hours?

Maybe it can be shown in parts on cable tv.

4 posted on 04/27/2006 5:06:46 PM PDT by Stepan12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Venator

Angelina Jolie? I'd much prefer Gillian Anderson in the role. Or Diane Kruger.




5 posted on 04/27/2006 5:09:36 PM PDT by oblomov (Join the FR Folding@Home Team (#36120) keyword: folding@home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venator

I just can't see Jolie in that role.


6 posted on 04/27/2006 5:10:26 PM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elfman2

Ping


7 posted on 04/27/2006 5:27:31 PM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venator

Angelina Jolie as Dagny Taggart? That's like casting Keanu Reeves as Jesus. (Not that they didn't quasi-try that in Constantine.)

In any case, I hope they don't make a mess of it. A box-office success could introduce a whole lot of people who've never been exposed to anything but CNN "truthiness" and mushy-headed liberal utopianism to the ultimate result and goal of that kind of thinking. It'd be nice if some of those people could walk out of a movie theater with some new insight into such matters.


8 posted on 04/27/2006 5:29:46 PM PDT by Turbopilot (Nothing in the above post is or should be construed as legal research, analysis, or advice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oblomov
Angelina Jolie?

Hard to believe she is an Ayn Rand fan. I would prefer Ashely Judd as Dagny.

9 posted on 04/27/2006 5:36:55 PM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint
I would prefer Ashely Judd as Dagny.

But who would you cast Morgan Freeman as? Morgan has to be in any movie Ashley is - I think it's in her contract. =p

10 posted on 04/27/2006 5:53:54 PM PDT by RabidBartender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RabidBartender
Morgan Freeman

Hmmmmmm. Let's see. Maybe he could play Wesley Mouch. No, that won't do. Morgan Freeman always plays the good guy so it would have to be Ken Danagger. Perfect.

11 posted on 04/27/2006 6:53:11 PM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Rokke

Thanks. Fans get excited whenever there’s news of this film, but I suspect it’ll create a lot more misunderstanding than understanding of Objectivism.

$35 million’s probably a low budget film these days. I think most hits spend more than that on promotion. And unless the film suppresses the moral-capitalist themes and cherry picks anti-religions insinuations from the 1200 page book to build the plot-line, they’ll get little free publicity.

That said, if it gets the Objectivist nerds away from their books and outsider for some fresh air and excitement, I’m for it.


12 posted on 04/28/2006 12:27:12 PM PDT by elfman2 (An army of amateurs doing the media's job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: elfman2
"the Objectivist nerds away from their books"

Hey now...some of them spend at least some of their time on FreeRepublic.

I'll go watch the movie. I can't read any book that doesn't come without a lot of pictures.

13 posted on 04/28/2006 12:56:11 PM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Rokke
"I can't read any book that doesn't come without a lot of pictures."

Understood. Every few pages, I had to flip over and look at the book cover to keep from taking a nap.

14 posted on 04/28/2006 1:14:32 PM PDT by elfman2 (An army of amateurs doing the media's job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson