Posted on 04/15/2005 1:58:48 PM PDT by johnmark7
Pearcy seeks to intimidate Bloggers
I have just received a phone call today at about 12:15 pm from Mr. Stephen Pearcy regarding this blog which I wrote March 9, 2005 about Mr. and Mrs. Pearcy who hung a soldier in effigy (twice) from the eaves of their home in Land Park in Sacramento. I also noted with links vulgar statements posted on Mr. Pearcys car.
In the call I received from Mr. Pearcy, he informed me that I am guilty of a tortious interference with a business relationship because I suggested that people who didnt like her private actions could email her employer.
I asked him if he was contemplating a potential cause of action against me. Yes, if warranted, he responded in approximate terms.
But looking over my blog on the matter, I am hard pressed to find an instance to support his claim other than this:
I suggest you contact them and let them know what you think of their employee as I did in this email I sent to both:
If this is illegal speech in California as Pearcy claims then I am indeed in trouble, but I find an action for this far fetched. Nevertheless, I appeal to all and sundry for expertise in the matter.
Diggers Realm points out that the Pearcys have put up an effigy of a soldier for the third time now.
(Excerpt) Read more at callistergreen.blogspot.com ...
"Free speech for me but not for thee"
(Like their employer didn't know what they were up to? These people need to get a grip on reality.)
Nonconformists travel as a rule in bunches. You rarely find a nonconformist who goes it alone. And woe to him inside a nonconformist clique who does not conform with nonconformity.
What I'm hoping to find is some definitive legal advice so I can blow the fellow away. I know he's full of it, but it helps to have all the facts lined up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.