Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/11/2005 2:08:32 PM PST by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: churchillbuff

Keyes is kind of like our Ward Churchill.


2 posted on 03/11/2005 2:12:27 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (This space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
I wish Keyes would stay away from the civics lessons - Federalist Papers, etc - - and focus on the facts of this case: A disabled woman who left no clear instructions is being put to death because her husband - who has two illegit kids with a woman he's shacked with - claims she said something years ago about end-of-life; all very suspicious - - - none of it clear and substantial evidence of her intent.

Repeating those facts will win converts. Lectures on the Federalist Papers will put people to sleep. (And besides, I don't necessarily agree that the other branches should be allowed to disobey court orders; we'd have chaos if there was no final interpreter of the laws --- -- in this case, what we need is the legislature to CHANGE the law and ORDER judges like Greer to go by a higher evidentiary standard when determining the "end of life" wishes of a disabled person.

3 posted on 03/11/2005 2:12:30 PM PST by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff

starvation is a horrible way to die.....this isnt 'cruel and unusual' ? this judge is evil. no other way to see it.


4 posted on 03/11/2005 2:12:42 PM PST by kingattax ( "Evil triumphs when good men do nothing." -Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
When an executive doesn't agree with a judicial opinion, he could just ignore it?

Keyes is advocating legal anarchy.

5 posted on 03/11/2005 2:12:52 PM PST by sinkspur ("Preach the gospel. If necessary, use words.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff

Before you start your lies again on THIS thread, you keep asking why Rush hasn't talked about this matter.

And yet, two posters at least told you yesterday that Rush HAS discussed this matter; right here:

"Both Rush and Hannity have discussed this recently (i.e. in the last week). I just wish they would have done more.

It's still not too late however. I guess what angers me the most is the coward that is sitting in the Governor's office.

He has every legal right and responsibility to keep this woman from being murdered by the court by stepping in and removing her from her husband's care and putting her into state care. Even at the risk of his political career this has to be done.

That is the difference between a Lion and a Lamb. Unfortunately, Jeb Bush is no lion, so Terri will be fed to the wolves. "




192 posted on 03/10/2005 7:49:12 PM EST by Leatherneck_MT (A Patriot must



6 posted on 03/11/2005 2:13:15 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
As you know, the governors can set aside judicial results, if they feel that a travesty has been done, or that an injustice has been done.

Huh? I think Keyes needs a refresher course.

8 posted on 03/11/2005 2:15:18 PM PST by TheOtherOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
Hail Terri...

Child of God...

We pray those judicial sinners...

Do not cause the hour of thy death...

Amen !!!

.

11 posted on 03/11/2005 2:21:54 PM PST by GeekDejure ( LOL = Liberals Obey Lucifer !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All; Ohioan from Florida

22 posted on 03/11/2005 3:26:36 PM PST by Future Useless Eater (FreedomLoving_Engineer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
Good grief. Keyes is stating that court decisions don't have to be observed by anyone in the executive branch. The National Park Service is free to take your land and throw you off without compensation, and whatever the courts say is irrelevant, according to the gospel of Keyes.

This guy is an embarrassment.

25 posted on 03/11/2005 4:24:34 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
means that the executive does not have to follow the judgment of the judges, but has his own separate responsibility to the Constitution and the law, and if he conscientiously believes that an injustice, a violation of fundamental constitutional law and right is taking place, he has an obligation not to acquiesce in it.

Wrong. Going down that road leads to impeachment. And Keyes neglects to tell us exactly what Jeb should do in defying the court. It is just repetitive generalized cant.

26 posted on 03/11/2005 4:26:18 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff

Keyes has demonstrated he knows very little of anything. His expertise is "Losing elections".


32 posted on 03/11/2005 9:57:58 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (You have a //cuckoo// God given right //Yeeeahrgh!!// to be an //Hello?// atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson