Infiltration

Infiltration ^ | 2004 | Infiltration

[theFIRMbss]

Infiltration offers a mix of the practice and theory of urban exploration in areas not designed
for public usage. This site is the online companion of the paper zine about going places you're
not supposed to go. The latest issue of the zine, focusing on sneaking into and around stadia
and arenas, just came out in September 2004.

[theFIRMbss]

Is something like this
happening here at FR?
Have the liberals

figured out they can't
destroy FR through trolling,
so they've decided

to infiltrate us,
and swamp the forum under
endless vanities?

To change the whole tone
of FR from news/comments
to random chatting?

[theFIRMbss]

ping

[anniegetyourgun]

Nah....I think it's just lack of self-discipline and lots of new folks who don't know SOP.

[cripplecreek]

I once went where I wasn't supposed to go. The campus cops nearly gave me a ticket for indecent exposure,

[gnarledmaw]

Infiltrate to post vanities? No. Its easier and more effective for the left to subvert conservative efforts by pretending to be conservative and then floating "moderate" anti-rights positions and promoting CINOs under the guise of just playing politics.

The big government lovers and various authoritarians fall for it on every thread.

[roses of sharon]

If they are smart they have. As should we.

But I would choose MSM newsrooms or mailrooms, radio, academia, Hollywood, ect.

A little "investigating" and infiltration from the right can go a long way to expose, discredit, and destroy the propagandists who have dominated our culture for 30 years.

Any takers?

[theFIRMbss]

>Its easier and more effective for the left to subvert conservative efforts by pretending to be conservative and then floating "moderate" anti-rights positions and promoting CINOs under the guise of just playing politics

Yes, but doing that
doesn't change the way we look
to outside surfers.

We'd still appear like
a site built on discussion
of news and events.

Posting VANITIES
changes the look of FR
and surfers see us

(and the mainstream can
dismiss us) as a right-wing
chat room just chatting . . .

[gnarledmaw]

The way FR looks is of no importance. Who FR types follow and what policies are pursued are of national importance. If anything, liberal invaders who were having an affect on the flow of ideas would want a site that is more efficient in relaying those ideas.

Posting "Red Sox Win" isnt going to keep those who are here for politics from working to achieve conservative goals but backing the idea that Arlen Sphincter needs to be "promoted out of the way" might get conservatives to work against their best interests. Even at the risk of sounding like Kwai Chang Kane, I must point out that it takes far less energy to redirect a force than to stop it and if one can harness that energy for their own agendas then so much the better.

[theFIRMbss]

>Even at the risk of sounding like Kwai Chang Kane, I must point out that it takes far less energy to redirect a force than to stop it and if one can harness that energy for their own agendas then so much the better

I certainly don't disagree with you (hell, I'm an aikido guy . . .) But I don't think we have only one thing to fear . . . Subtle left-wing trolls can hijack whole threads, while at the same time endless vanities dilute the forum's focus and make regulars weary of clicking on threads. The infiltration danger is the same, the goals of the trolls the same. The classic response to dealing with jiu jitsu is never grapple! I hope Jim bluntly won't grapple with VANITIES and just outlaws them.

[cgk]

BUMP! Bookmarked.