Posted on 09/20/2004 12:20:54 PM PDT by THJNewYorkCity
In the last week I read a coherent explanation in the New York Times, New York Post, or a conservative web page like The Weekly Standard or Wall Street Journal that makes the entire Kerry medals controversy clear. This blog, in fact, has a discussion about Kerry's first "tour" on a boat kept off shore and facing no danger and not even considered to be a "tour" in Vietnam but his second was more dangerous than he ever expected.
This should be in breaking news! Nobody ever thought of this before!
Somebody ought to write a BOOK about Kerry's tour on Swiftboats in Vietnam!
Welcome aboard!
Here's the article in the New York Times....Kristof points to this about Kerry in the NYT this past Saturday (link below:)
Did Mr. Kerry volunteer for dangerous duty? Not as much as his campaign would like you to believe. The Kerry Web site declares, "As he was graduating from Yale, John Kerry volunteered to serve in Vietnam - because, as he later said, 'It was the right thing to do.' "
In fact, as Mr. Kerry was about to graduate from Yale, he was inquiring about getting an educational deferment to study in Europe. When that got nowhere, he volunteered for the Navy, which was much less likely to involve danger in Vietnam than other services. After a year on a ship in the ocean, Mr. Kerry volunteered for Swift boats, but at that time they were used only in Vietnam's coastal waters. A short time later, the Swift boats were assigned exceptionally dangerous duties up Vietnamese rivers. "When I signed up for the Swift boats, they had very little to do with the war,'' Mr. Kerry wrote in 1986, adding, "I didn't really want to get involved in the war."
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/18/opinion/18kristof.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.