[editor-surveyor]

"Do KJVist's believe that because the KJV is authorized by God that it is perfect in it's english form?"

The real issue is do you believe that God has kept his promise to preserve his word, or not? There are some here who clearly do not believe that he has kept his promise. They insist that "only the original autographs" (which obviously do not exist) were inspired. The scriptures do not support the "original autographs" position, but the newbible trust still keeps screaming, and stamping their figurative feet here.

[lews]

-- The real issue is do you believe that God has kept his promise to preserve his word, or not? --

Does the fact that God has preserved His word imply that a particular translation is perfect (absolutely no errors), or, simply inspired (subject to human interpretation fault)? What side of this issue do the KJVist's take?