Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why don't creationists publish?
Jehovah's Witnes Discussion Forum ^ | 5-2-03 | German JW

Posted on 05/13/2003 2:49:16 AM PDT by Con X-Poser

Recently, Dr. Wolf-Ekkehard Loennig, a JW working in a leading position at the Gene-Science-Department at the Max-Planck-Institute, has been banned from the Institute's WebSite for spreading his view about Evolution. He promotes the so called "Intelligent Design".

Max-Planck-Institute calles this Creationism in disguise. They said they ridiculed themselves by letting him keep on. Despite he had the support of his boss, Loennig's WebSite is now gone and subject to investigation.

I am not competent in discussing the topic on this level but I prefer a dialogue to a ban. It seems the Max-Planck-Institute has run short on arguments.

You find Loennig private WebSite here: http://www.we-loennig.de/

You find a discussion of the ban (in German) here: http://www.vdbiol.de/debatten/evolution/evolution.html


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: crevolist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 641-645 next last
No wonder creationists have trouble publishing in secular media - they aren't even allowed to post their views on a website, even if they are eminently qualified scientists.
1 posted on 05/13/2003 2:49:16 AM PDT by Con X-Poser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Con X-Poser
"It is error alone which requires the protection of government. The truth can stand by itself."
2 posted on 05/13/2003 3:06:48 AM PDT by sackofcatfood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sackofcatfood
Creation has already been published in the first few chapters of Genesis. All other published works are designed to challenge the original work and so far have failed.
3 posted on 05/13/2003 5:33:24 AM PDT by Cameron1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Con X-Poser
No wonder creationists have trouble publishing in secular media - they aren't even allowed to post their views on a website, even if they are eminently qualified scientists.

I don't care if they are "eminently qualified scientists." I do care whether their conclusions are correct.

And one does not have an inalienable right to post on someone else's website.

Refereed journals do not weigh qualifications, titles, et cetera--they merely evaluate the arguments and the evidence presented to support the arguments.

4 posted on 05/13/2003 5:37:26 AM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Con X-Poser
A Baptist friend of mine has a whole library of creationists books.
5 posted on 05/13/2003 5:42:54 AM PDT by biblewonk (Spose to be a Chrissssstian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Con X-Poser
Should advocates of the "moon is green cheese" theory be given equal time on NASA websites?

Should advocates of the "stork brings babies" theory be given equal time on medical maternity websites?

Should flat earthers be given equal time on geology websites?
6 posted on 05/13/2003 7:01:32 AM PDT by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Con X-Poser
http://www.creationtruth.com

I see lots of publications here.
7 posted on 05/13/2003 8:10:58 AM PDT by Chewbacca (My life is a Dilbert cartoon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sackofcatfood
socf ...

"It is error alone which requires the protection of government. The truth can stand by itself."


2 posted on 05/13/2003 3:06 AM PDT by sackofcatfood

fC ...

This is exactly the case in America ....

Evolution is a bolshevik monopoly ---

run by anarcho-nazi-loons !

8 posted on 05/13/2003 10:54:41 AM PDT by f.Christian (( I'm sure we could mount a "pay f.christian off" fund to get you to leave ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cameron1
c1 ...

Creation has already been published in the first few chapters of Genesis. All other published works are designed to challenge the original work and so far have failed.

fC ...

The main avenue --- Broadway of destruction --- reprobation ...

check this one out !

ss ...

Race, evolutionary theory, in fact, reveals the Glory of God ... even more --- than creationism.

9 posted on 05/13/2003 11:12:38 AM PDT by f.Christian (( I'm sure we could mount a "pay f.christian off" fund to get you to leave ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jlogajan
Self diety // worship (( flatliners )) ... brainwashing (( moon -- cheese -- storks )) --- is a form of atheism --- evolution !
10 posted on 05/13/2003 11:42:59 AM PDT by f.Christian (( I'm sure we could mount a "pay f.christian off" fund to get you to leave ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Rubber god believers ... who reject plastic god believers --- whatta leap -- hop (( backwards ))!


11 posted on 05/13/2003 12:02:46 PM PDT by f.Christian (( I'm sure we could mount a "pay f.christian off" fund to get you to leave ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry; jennyp; donh
... boring !
12 posted on 05/13/2003 12:33:31 PM PDT by f.Christian (( I'm sure we could mount a "pay f.christian off" fund to get you to leave ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Con X-Poser
I'm deeply troubled that f. Christian can't get published.
13 posted on 05/13/2003 1:01:25 PM PDT by jennyp (http://crevo.bestmessageboard.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000; balrog666; Condorman; *crevo_list; donh; general_re; Godel; Gumlegs; Ichneumon; jennyp; ..
Ping
14 posted on 05/13/2003 1:06:04 PM PDT by Junior (Computers make very fast, very accurate mistakes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
Speak for yourself--and ONLY yourself! Leave the little voices out of it!
15 posted on 05/13/2003 1:07:24 PM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
"I don't care if they are "eminently qualified scientists." I do care whether their conclusions are correct."

If the conclusions are the issue, then why ban rather than debate?

16 posted on 05/13/2003 1:09:31 PM PDT by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cameron1
And any earth science textbook can back it up.

You have your heavens, your earth, your water, etc.

All in order. Just as Genesis clearly states.

17 posted on 05/13/2003 1:11:25 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: Poohbah
Here Here!

I have trouble keeping up sometimes, but always find it a facinating read
19 posted on 05/13/2003 1:12:56 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Cameron1
The late Luther Sunderland of Apalachin, NY, published but I don't know the names of his books. He was a creationist and well known in his time.
20 posted on 05/13/2003 1:14:55 PM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD is still in control!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 641-645 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson