Or is the goal to enact conservative measures and policies?
In the long run, it seems to me that the real task is PERSUADING actual voters, of the benefits of conservative policies.
My guess is that, for instance, a Libby Dole would vote for my policy positions, more often than her democrat opponent. She should be a strong candidate, based on name recognition, her resume, etc.
Therefore I get more of my conservative policies passed, with her in office, instead of her democrat opponent.
The debate on FR seems to be ill focused, on party domination, not on actual legislative votes and policies.
I believe in the long run, conservatism will BENEFIT, from working through a single BIG party. Let the debate continue, inside the party. Yell, scream, kick, threaten; but stay in the party. Observe Reagan's Law.
The liberals benefit from having conservatives, spread through several parties. Notice the effect of a Nader/Green party? It benefits conservatives and Republicans; it harms liberals and democrats.
The reverse is also true.
If we have a coherent ideology and are able to articulate that ideology we can persuade the voters.