This author assumes that the accusations against the PIAPS were all unfounded.
While his knowledge of historical elections is insightful his inability to acknowledge the criminality and scandals of the Clintons discredits his conclusion as does his statement that her “gender” played a role. The people that didn’t vote for Clintdog would have voted for Sarah Palin.
Satan’s Prom Queen lost because the people that oppose her are convinced that she is a criminal of almost fictional proportions, like a master criminal in a James Bond novel and she has done nothing to dissuade them that.
How many excuses has she given?
No, no. Soros is the Bond villain. But Hillary is a top-level henchwoman.
Actually, her gender did play a role: she misunderstood the concept of feminism, which has something to do with achievement, and instead used her marital status and gender to get ahead by strictly political and even criminal methods.
This is the great danger of political correctness. If we elect someone because of their racial or gender status, we are not getting the most qualified person.