Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Hetty_Fauxvert

The problem with indictment is that it can only be done by a vested authority of *citizens* whose purpose is to decide indictment. A grand jury.

Even the US Attorney General cannot indict someone. He can only ask a federal grand jury to indict.

The Fifth Amendment to the U. S. Constitution provides that “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on presentment of a Grand Jury...”

So what they really wanted was that this board could forward a criminal complaint, which is similar to an indictment, but issued by a judge.

A criminal complaint is issued by a prosecutor, followed by a “preliminary hearing” held by a lower court judge or other magistrate, who will determine whether or not the prosecutor has presented sufficient evidence that the accused has committed a felony. If the judge finds there is enough evidence, he/she will order the case sent to the appropriate court for trial.


4 posted on 02/07/2015 6:53:43 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

Yup. The law here in this area has to change for all this to happen. That requires a ballot. Going to be uphill all the way, and maybe fall off the cliff at the end.

The Andy Lopez case was already given to our local grand jury, and they refused it on the grounds that they were not qualified to make a pronouncement.


5 posted on 02/07/2015 3:34:16 PM PST by Hetty_Fauxvert (FUBO, and the useful idiots you rode in on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson