Proof? You want proof this is bogus?
How about basic chemistry? A proton plus an electron does NOT create a neutron. A neutron is an elemental subatomic particle with no charge and you can’t create one by “mashing” an electron and proton together.
Also note the vague “scientific” jargon like “suitable internal geometry”. What does that even mean? Sounds like a better worded Nigerian scam email.
People will always find ways to separate fools from their money.
Firstly, this isn't chemistry (I'm a chemist). It's nucleonics.
"A proton plus an electron does NOT create a neutron. A neutron is an elemental subatomic particle with no charge and you can’t create one by “mashing” an electron and proton together."
Wrong. Neutrons can and do decompose into protons and electrons (beta decay), so the reverse process is certainly not impossible.
‘Also note the vague “scientific” jargon like “suitable internal geometry”. What does that even mean? Sounds like a better worded Nigerian scam email.’
If you follow the link at post #11, there is a bit deeper scientific explanation.
It may in fact be a solution that will revolutionize energy generation. We’ll see...
>>People will always find ways to separate fools from their money.<<
I have met people where the “more money than brains” certainly applied. In some cases it was just $20, in others it was in the high millions. Where do you fit into that picture?
Proof? You want proof this is bogus?
***Yes. He said it was provable, so I’m asking for that proof. All I get is crickets. Because there is no proof.
How about basic chemistry? A proton plus an electron does NOT create a neutron. A neutron is an elemental subatomic particle with no charge and you can’t create one by “mashing” an electron and proton together.
***That just means the guys at oilprice.com aren’t very good writers. That doesn’t prove LENR is bogus.
Also note the vague “scientific” jargon like “suitable internal geometry”. What does that even mean?
***The Internal geometry of the metal lattice matrix is known to be critical for LENR formation. Whether it’s Palladium with Deuterium or Nickel with Hydrogen. Both lattices have shown that the internal geometry is critical. Of course, if you haven’t been following LENR, you wouldn’t be aware of that. But doesn’t mean LENR is bogus, it means you don’t have the background to loudly proclaim it to be bogus.
Sounds like a better worded Nigerian scam email.
***And your bloviating sounds like all the other hypercritical anti-science bloviating we’ve been witnessing here on FR for the past few years.
People will always find ways to separate fools from their money.
***So your concern is duly noted, over $20M of private funding. Where is your concern for the hundreds of $Billions poured down the rathole of hot fusion? Silent, just like your scientific background.