Replies

Obama is exposed. Read http://svenmagnussen.blogspot.com Your concern for credit, glory, or money is blinding you to the facts about Obama’s ineligibility.

You, and others, are singularly focused on presenting evidence pretrial under the false premise a Federal Judge will ignore the FRCP to bring Obama to trial. It’s not going to happen. The FRCP must be followed.

A careful review of the FRCP will reveal secondary source witnesses, such as myself and Tim Adams, should not be a part of the controversy until the primary source is deposed and impeachment of their testimony is necessary. A secondary source witness won’t be necessary if the primary source tells the truth. Rules on the introduction of impeachment witnesses are necessary for the Court’s case management.

In Obama’s case, my testimony and Tim Adam’s testimony will be irrelevant if DHS Sec. Janet Napolitano produces certified copies of Obama’s immigration files. If the Sec. Napolitano testified, under oath in a deposition, Obama did not have an immigration file to reveal, then the Court and the defendant would be notified an impeachment witness will be called to offer a rebuttal. In the interest of case management, the FRCP has rules that indicate my rebuttal testimony will be ignored until the primary source has a chance to testify truthfully.

Not following the rules will delay the process further.

Sven,

A question:

Who has standing to bring this suit, of which you speak, in the first place?

Per your post (copied below **) there needs to be a lawsuit that gets past denial and to discovery, then this suit then has to get to the point that napolitano gets deposed and if she lies, then you and tim Adams can give depositions refuting what she says.

But the problem is, all previous suits have been dismissed, most on account of “no standing” and some on other procedural items.

From your first paragraph:

“....Your concern for credit, glory or money.....”

Look up the Declaration of Arbroath for my answer to this!!!!!!

**
SvenMagnussen wrote:

Obama is exposed. Read http://svenmagnussen.blogspot.com Your concern for credit,glory,or money is blinding you to the facts about Obama’s ineligibility.

You,and others,are singularly focused on presenting evidence pretrial under the false premise a Federal Judge will ignore the FRCP to bring Obama to trial. It’s not going to happen. The FRCP must be followed.

A careful review of the FRCP will reveal secondary source witnesses,such as myself and Tim Adams,should not be a part of the controversy until the primary source is deposed and impeachment of their testimony is necessary. A secondary source witness won’t be necessary if the primary source tells the truth. Rules on the introduction of impeachment witnesses are necessary for the Court’s case management.

In Obama’s case,my testimony and Tim Adam’s testimony will be irrelevant if DHS Sec. Janet Napolitano produces certified copies of Obama’s immigration files. If the Sec. Napolitano testified, under oath in a deposition,Obama did not have an immigration file to reveal,then the Court and the defendant would be notified an impeachment witness will be called to offer a rebuttal. In the interest of case management,the FRCP has rules that indicate my rebuttal testimony will be ignored until the primary source has a chance to testify truthfully.

Not following the rules will delay the process further.