So you’re a physicist who doesn’t know freshman year critical thinking and who prefers to tussle with pedestrians rather than other physicists.
Kevmo, the pedestrian. I'm going to remember that. Given your own admitted shortcomings in physics, why should we trust that your judgement of someone else's critical thinking is any better, especially given your documented inclination to do personal attacks and call names?
Many of the things you've posted here are incorrect, including the very broad claim that this experiment has some implications specific to LENR. It doesn't. I'm sorry that you don't understand why it doesn't, but I hope less emotional readers will benefit from my attempts to correct you. It's clear that you're too emotionally involved to benefit yourself.