“Vehicular assault is a felony.”
If there was a vehicular assault (and there are two articles and they describe it differently), the woman who was shot wasn’t driving, and it would be tough to prove that she had anything to do with it.
She was at the very least, an accessory to the crime or crimes. Why are you a criminal apologist?
She was an accessory to a crime unless she was kidnapped or a hostage. Hadn't she been ordered to stay out of Walmart stores? Why do you defend scofflaws and criminal behavior?