Your assumptions are most revealing; you refuse to allow for the notion that a very wicked cop would *not* strike the first innocent in his path when someone sprays silly string and some of it touches the cop.
Did someone deliberately aim the silly string/water/projectile at the cop? Not necessarily. The woman was struck as well; it’s a parade, if you walk past people spraying silly string, etc about, you will likely get sprayed.
Someone who refuses to conceive or admit that a person, by virtue of their occupation, is incapable of engaging in wickedness, by default is *worshiping* members of that occupation.
Punching someone for the offense of being sprayed with silly string / water is way out of line for anyone other than a government worshiper.
You are making a lot of assumptions, many more than I am making, and yet, you are accusing me. What gives you this right, while you would deny it to me?
If the cop is in the wrong, fine. Hang him. He deserves the most severe repercussions imaginable if his action was unjustified. But unless the Constitution has changed, even HE has the right to an investigation and trial, which, it seems, many so-called “conservatives” here would deny him.
Did you watch the Rodney King “beating” videos? Did you agree with the looters?