A set of facts that you asked for from the video that you cannot refute.
You’ve been at it since you flip flopped on this issue about mid-thread.
Well forgive me, oh lord of the threads, but I thought the purpose of these threads was discussion with an open mind. I didn't realize that I had to enter every thread with a closed mind that cannot be changed by other posters with other information.
I will, however, wait in the future before responding to your initial posts on threads to give you a chance to figure out what your position is going to be.
You will be waiting a long time. Persuading other posters and being persuaded to change one's mind about something is part of the discussion process.
And no, I have no visual evidence that anyone was attempting to flee. Neither do you.
So then on your tape as the officer is moving toward her she's standing still and facing him and not stepping up on the curb to try to get away from him.
Is that what you're trying to tell me???
A set of facts that you asked for from the video that you cannot refute.
<><><><
You mean like her resisting arrest? Here’s my refutation. She was not charged with resisting arrest.
Or like you claiming she sprayed them with silly string? Here’s my refutation. The cops claim she threw beer on them. And they were there. You were not.
Or your claim that she attempted to flee? Here’s my refutation. She was not charged with attempting to flee.
So, as I said before, you have made a very transparent attempt to introduce your own set of facts into this discussion, every one of which is refuted by the cops themselves and the charging document.
Do you see how that works?