Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Sloth

Hating cops, law and order is a liberal characteristic. Wear it.


256 posted on 10/02/2012 7:23:41 AM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies ]


To: fwdude
Hating cops, law and order is a liberal characteristic. Wear it.

Funny thing; if you love justice and [right/just] law, then you must be predisposed to hating cops [as-a-group] for the evil they do by both action and inaction.

Let me give you an example; the New Mexico State Constitution says, in Art II, Sec 6:

[Right to bear arms.]
No law shall abridge the right of the citizen to keep and bear arms for security and defense, for lawful hunting and recreational use and for other lawful purposes, but nothing herein shall be held to permit the carrying of concealed weapons. No municipality or county shall regulate, in any way, an incident of the right to keep and bear arms. (As amended November 2, 1971 and November 2, 1986.)
Yet, the state does abridge the right to keep and bear arms, both in its statutes [see NMSA 30-7-2.4] and in its own 'rules.' This last case is particularly insidious because it takes the color of law, without being law: to wit, the courthouses in New Mexico have signs, prominently displayed, proclaiming "No Weapons, violators will be prosecuted" (or similar). Now if that were by law, it would violate the underlined portion of the State Constitution, if it is not law then it is a federal felony, actually two, that is being perpetrated. More disturbing is that even municipal courts have such signs, which unambiguously violates the second sentence of the cited section of the state constitution.

You may be inclined to argue that weapons should not be allowed in courthouses; but the USSC has ruled, repeatedly, that the police are not under an affirmative obligation to provide for the safety of any particular private citizen.

It is also worth noting that a citizen may be compelled to appear in court despite not even being accused of a crime (jurors and witnesses); that they are deprived of their weapons combined with the legal obligation to appear is a travesty against justice and a de facto denial of the individual's inherent right to defend themselves.

300 posted on 10/03/2012 9:16:30 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude

Really?

Tell that to Paul Revere, Samuel Adams, and the Sons of Liberty.

But I want to be there so I can watch you being tarred feathered.


311 posted on 10/03/2012 3:33:32 PM PDT by Little Ray (AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson