I can’t believe it has been since 1996 when I first came here. How time has flown. My respect for you is enormous, my friend. Since we are both in California, we have the luxury of voting our conscience because California is lost. If I were in a swing state where it mattered, my view might be different.
That having been said, I do not believe I am an alarmist when I say that four more years of Obama unrestrained is going to destroy this nation. Romney must defeat him. And then, we work together and fight hard as hell to stop his social agenda and win this culture war in which we are engaged.
Thank you for this common sense observation. It is easy to take a firm principled stand when it is not likely to affect the outcome, but in the swing states, the issue is not quite so clear. There are some issues where I agree with Romney and others I don't, but there are no issues where I agree with Oboma. Since one or the other will be elected to serve as president for the next four years, I will vote for the one I believe will be the best in the dual role of chief executive and commander in chief. I will continue to look elsewhere for my religious and moral leadership.
Member since 1997 here.
The old Jim Robinson would have thrown the new Jim Robinson off the board once upon a time, yet nowadays vice versa it appears.
Fascinating and depressing.
The Supreme Court was supposed to check and balance Soetoro. They failed. The game has changed. No one has the luxury of voting their conscience. It is survival and a tactical decision. Soetoro has got to go. The more votes against him, the less spin there will be. A crashing defeat of Soetoro will send the message even Willard will get.
Thank you Douglas.