WELL I’LL TELLYA KEMO...more to the point......howsabout YOU hike over to MITT’S HOME PAGE HERE AND READ ....IN PARTICULAR.... HIS ISSUES STATEMENTS. Read his stance on all the issues then you hike back here and tell us which ones you object to and why....they all make sense to the sensible ....so git movin..(i’ve made it easy for you here’s the url...) we’re waiting...
http://www.mittromney.com/issues
I have no reason to hike over to Mitt’s home page and look at what issues he currently wants to lie to us about. I’ve seen enough here on FR, in particular the RomneyTruthFile which is in the first paragraph of the front page of FR.
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/romneytruthfile/
The man will say anything to become president.
When did "Gumby" convert to a Moses type -- writing his issues on stone?
Saying Mitt would keep past political promises is like prophesying that Gumby won't bend anymore. Romney is a protean -- one "constantly changing" In fact, we know how bad Romney is by simply reading all the critiques of him by his supporters -- Romney proselytes who criticized him right and left in the past during the primaries! As new Romney devotees, they are singing a different tune! And that tune has absolutely NOTHING to do with Romney himself! We don't cater to politicians who attempt to hoodwink us into getting us to think they are "conservative" when they are authentics RINOs. Romney is a genuine snollygoster (a "fellow who wants office regardless of party, platform or principles..."). To coin an old humorous saying, "Half the lies Romney tells about his track record aren't true!"
Let's look @ just three "manipulative" word-games the Romneys have played during their "pro-life" campaigning (the last three we don't even need to go back to his wide-open "pro-abort" years):
Example A: January 29, 2007 during South Carolina visit, Romney stated: “Over the last multiple years, as you know, I have been effectively pro-choice." (Bruce Smith, "Romney Campaigns in SC with Sen. DeMint," The Associated Press, 1/29/07; yet on another South Carolina campaign stop Romney was claiming "I was ALWAYS for life”: "I am firmly pro-life… I was ALWAYS for life." (Jim Davenport, "Romney Affirms Opposition to Abortion," The Associated Press, 2/9/2007)
If you think that was simply a "miscue" type of statement politicians occasionally make on the campaign trail, listen to...
Example B: ...these jumbled words Romney told Chris Wallace of Fox during an August 12, 2007 interview:
"I never called myself pro-choice. I never allowed myself to use the word pro-choice because I didn't FEEL I was pro-choice. I would protect the law, I said, as it was, but I wasn't pro-choice, and so..."
Example C:
Ann Romney further tossed in confusing rhetoric about Mitt Romney's supposed "former" pro-abort positioning in her Parade Magazine interview (November, 2011):
In the past you’ve said he’s changed positions only once, on abortion. Was that your doing? No, no, I never talked to Mitt about that. Our personal opinions have never changed; we’ve ALWAYS been pro-life." (Ann Romney Reveals Mitt's Softer Side)
And NOW you're telling us...we're to believe EVERYTHING Romney says on his Web page...Wow...Talk about naive.
****************
Btw...even during Romney's pro-abort years, he had this penchant for not honoring the truth...Here is More Mitt-Fudging on the Truth...from 2001:
"I do not wish to be labeled pro-choice." (Mitt Romney, Letter to the Editor, The Salt Lake Tribune, 7/12/01)