Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Meet the New Boss
The last part of your statement was steeped in stupidity. So much so that it boggles the mind and dulls the senses. I cant even make a response to it because reading it took my breath away.
Since we are taking the Clinton “definition of “Is” is approach to this, the phrase “ we dont need you to do that” is a polite way of saying” stop doing it we have someone on the way”. Why the dispatcher didnt say it is beyond me. If you were driving home and saw a brush fire,and you called the fire dept and told them’I am going to put it out” and the dispatcher told you the same thing, would you still go into the field and stomp out the fire or would you let the fire department do it? The dispatcher isnt a fireman,he dont know anything about firefighting and he is sitting behind a console,sipping a Coke.
All i am saying is that Zimmerman acted outside the scope of his experience.
71 posted on 04/22/2012 3:51:27 PM PDT by Yorlik803 (better to die on your feet than live on your knees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: Yorlik803
You have "blundered into" an argument armed with nothing but bullsh!t.

Neighborhood watch is suppost to be observe and report.

Zimmerman was not on neighborhood watch duty at the time of the incident. He was on his way out to run an errand.

Zimmerman stated that he was walking back to his car, and not following Martin, when he was attacked by Martin.

The prosecution CONCEDED in the Bond hearing that they have NO evidence to contradict that fact.

O'MARA: My question was do you have any evidence to contradict or that conflicts with his contention given before he knew any of the evidence that would conflict with the fact that he stated "I walked back to my car"?

GILBREATH: No.

The prosecution also conceded in the bond hearing that they have absolutely NO evidence to contradict Zimmerman's statement that Martin assaulted him.

He was told by police dispatchers to break off following the scumbag but continued doing so {Police dispatchers are agents for the police}.

As I have corrected you but you pretend not to understand he was not "told to break off following."

A police dispatcher whether or not an "agent for the police" has NO AUTHORITY TO ORDER AROUND CITIZENS. You would make a good little subject for a police state, however.

He blundered into a situation he wasn't prepared or trained for.

Wrong. He was heading back to his car when he was sucker punched.

It sounds like he was looking for a fight.

Not according to all the reported facts. But just make up whatever the hell facts you feel like.

If you were driving home and saw a brush fire,and you called the fire dept and told them’I am going to put it out” and the dispatcher told you the same thing, would you still go into the field and stomp out the fire or would you let the fire department do it?

OF COURSE I WOULD PUT OUT THE DAMN FIRE IF I COULD. Rather than let it get out of control waiting for who knows how long before an official fire truck decides to show up.

75 posted on 04/22/2012 4:29:23 PM PDT by Meet the New Boss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: Yorlik803

Zimmerman walked to point E where he completed his call with the dispatcher.

He was walking back toward his car at point C when Martin assaulted him. The prosecution has conceded they do not have evidence that this was not what happened.

Martin was not walking home at the time of the altercation, but had double-backed to confront Zimmerman.

If Martin was actually walking directly home (in fact, his father's girlfriend's home), he would have been there before Zimmerman's call even ended.


76 posted on 04/22/2012 4:48:30 PM PDT by Meet the New Boss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson