Should they be able to do this based on the fact that the state pays a stipend to foster parents?
1 posted on
11/29/2006 7:26:09 AM PST by
Froufrou
To: SheLion; Eaker; humblegunner
More clamps on smokers ping.
2 posted on
11/29/2006 7:27:34 AM PST by
Froufrou
To: 1riot1ranger; Action-America; Aggie Mama; Alkhin; Allegra; American72; antivenom; Antoninus II; ...
3 posted on
11/29/2006 7:29:41 AM PST by
weegee
(Remember "Remember the Maine"? Well in the current war "Remember the Baby Milk Factory")
To: Froufrou
Yes, keep those irresponsible smoking parents away and let's give these children to the types who'd beat them and lock them naked in closets
4 posted on
11/29/2006 7:35:05 AM PST by
NRA1995
(Clinton "tried", 3000 died)
To: Froufrou
They better work on that whole 'fire-arms' thingy first before they tell Texans to stop smoking in their homes...
To: Froufrou
Will they continue to support a ban on foster children in same sex couple households?
Obviously the state believes they have a compelling interest to protect children from harmful influences.
6 posted on
11/29/2006 7:37:45 AM PST by
weegee
(Remember "Remember the Maine"? Well in the current war "Remember the Baby Milk Factory")
To: Froufrou
So if the butt is a clove cigarette, violation yes/no?
How about just the roach left over from a nice fat marijuana joint, violation yes/no?
Banana peel cigarette, violation yes/no?
How about a dried grape vine, violation yes/no?
American indian halucinagenic herbs, violation yes/no?
Nope, only tobacco. Want to make a million bucks? Breed a plant close enough to tobacco to taste identical when burned but far enough that any plant expert would class it as a different species (or even genis).
8 posted on
11/29/2006 8:03:06 AM PST by
GulfBreeze
(I asked God about it and he doesn't believe in atheists either. So can you prove they exist?)
To: Froufrou
Should they be able to do this based on the fact that the state pays a stipend to foster parents? Yes. You take their money, you have to play by their rules.
9 posted on
11/29/2006 8:09:47 AM PST by
MamaTexan
( I am not a ~legal entity~....... nor am I a 'person' as created by law.)
To: Froufrou
"If we were doing a monitoring visit and we came out and found that there were cigarette butts in the ash try, that would mean that somebody was smoking in the house, and that would be a violation."
22 posted on
11/29/2006 6:07:32 PM PST by
SheLion
(When you're right, take up the fight!!!!!)
To: Froufrou
It is believed to be the toughest anti smoking rules in the country, and the first rules ever approved that prohibit smoking inside detached homes.Liar liar pants on fire!
Maine started this BS in 2004!!!!
23 posted on
11/29/2006 6:08:46 PM PST by
SheLion
(When you're right, take up the fight!!!!!)
To: Froufrou
24 posted on
11/29/2006 6:11:26 PM PST by
SheLion
(When you're right, take up the fight!!!!!)
To: Froufrou
When they're done with the people who smoke, they'll start on the people who eat Twinkies, and end with a humorless society free of any socialization or human interaction.
Then, the younger generations will start eating the older generations for fun, and society will be done.
To: Froufrou
Nothing like reducing their potential pool for Foster Parents. I guess they feel the greater good is served by ensuring that children do not get the care and upbringing in a home. Warehousing is much preferred.
29 posted on
11/30/2006 5:40:32 AM PST by
CSM
(Americans are getting more and more childish and looking for Big Mommy to take care of them.)
To: Froufrou
Foster kids are going to be out of luck. I bet that the "government" that made up this rule will rue the day they extended their "rules" in to private homes! That's fine. Those "government" freaks can take all the foster kids!
To: Froufrou
I was joking with a friend the other day and we were discussing child abuse and he mentioned homosexual molestation. I said that no, that was man-boy love and perfectly acceptable, but if you're smoking while diddling the little guy, now THAT's child abuse.</p>
34 posted on
11/30/2006 8:05:24 AM PST by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: Froufrou
Measure Would Prohibit Texans From Smoking In Their Own Homes ---
I'm astonished.
****
36 posted on
12/01/2006 1:19:14 PM PST by
beyond the sea
( All lies and jest, still the man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest.)
To: Froufrou
Just Fu8king Great now the government is trying to tell us how to barbecue?
38 posted on
12/01/2006 4:48:30 PM PST by
IllumiNaughtyByNature
(If a pug barks and no one is around to hear it... they hold a grudge for a long time!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
