Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: One Proud Dad

You have yet to condemn the police who roughed up the old folks. When does that happen?

You insist all the blame lies with the one guy who got the warrant.

I insist that the guys who roughed up the old people should be held liable for their own actions.

You have yet to answer the same question I have asked you four times. Why should I answer any of your questions?


250 posted on 03/23/2006 2:56:51 PM PST by Supernatural (Ea wull staun ma groon, Staun ma groon al nae be afraid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies ]


To: Supernatural

I have answer that question in 3 posts. Prove they were injured by officers and charge each on involved. Now on 4 posts.

I have never in any post defended any officer who purposely or malicously injures anyone. Ever.


253 posted on 03/23/2006 3:02:53 PM PST by One Proud Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies ]

To: Supernatural
I got no answer to my questions either.

To 42: The suspect you were apprehending was what? A murder? Serial killer? Terrorist? A drug dealer that would have no turf to protect if not for the war on drugs and in all probability wouldn't be a drug dealer if not for the WOsomeD.129

SWAT goes where it is asked and has the lawful instrument supporting that position.51

Nazis tried that: "I was just following orders, doing my job.", at the Nuremberg trials.143

256 posted on 03/23/2006 3:08:55 PM PST by Zon (Honesty outlives the lie, spin and deception -- It always has -- It always will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson