LOL! 
Posted on 07/20/2004 10:50:55 PM PDT by cryptical
WASHINGTON - The government is violating federal law by obstructing medical marijuana research, scientists contend in lawsuits seeking faster action on applications to grow the drug.
In lawsuits to be filed Wednesday, researchers assert that Washington is refusing to act on legitimate research projects and delaying studies that could lead to marijuana's use as a prescription drug.
"There is an urgent need for an alternative supply of marijuana for medical research," said Lyle Craker, director of the Medicinal Plant Program at the University of Massachusetts-Amherst, the main force behind the lawsuits.
The National Institute on Drug Abuse, part of the Health and Human Services Department, "maintains a monopoly on research marijuana. Many researchers believe that NIDA's monopoly is an obstacle to getting needed studies done on a timely basis," Craker said in a statement.
The lawsuits, which target the Drug Enforcement Administration, HHS, NIDA and the National Institutes of Health, are being filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.
Joining Craker in filing the suit are Rick Doblin, president of the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies, and Valerie Corral, co-founder of the Wo/Men's Alliance for Medical Marijuana in Santa Cruz, Calif., who uses marijuana to control epileptic seizures.
"As a patient, each day brings new struggles," she said in a statement. "Instead of providing relief for critically ill Americans, our government refuses to allow the research that would free sick and dying members of our collective from living in fear of an administration that views medical assistance as criminal activity."
The case claims an unreasonable delay in acting on a three-year-old application by the University of Massachusetts-Amherst to grow marijuana for federally approved researchers.
Scientists also want the government to act on a year-old application by Chemic Laboratories in Canton, Mass., to import 10 grams of marijuana from Dutch authorities for research into a device called the Volcano Vaporizer. The device potentially offers a nonsmoking way to deliver the medicinal value of marijuana.
"Every day DEA delays the applications necessary to initiate research is another day that the patients with illnesses susceptible to treatment using marijuana must either suffer otherwise remediable pain, or risk arrest to use marijuana as medicine," said the scientists behind the suits.
DEA spokesman Ed Childress said the agency won't discuss pending lawsuits.
All marijuana for research in the United States must come from a crop grown on a federally contracted farm in Mississippi. That product has been only "inconsistently available to researchers and is infamous for its low quality," the researchers contend.
ON THE NET
Drug Enforcement Administration: http://www.dea.gov
National Institute on Drug Abuse: http://www.nida.nih.gov/
Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies: http://www.maps.org
University of Massachusetts-Amherst: http://www.umass.edu/
LOL!
Have you EVER seen that poster cut and run like that? I mean that person would play "last word" with anyone for hours on end. Until now. LOL
SBRed. 'Nuff said.
Sorry, I don't understand the acronym.
Threads sent to the Smokey BackRoom are doomed to irrelevance.
Word is the JBTs get a 'Golden Doughnut"
for so trashing these threads. ;^)
Ahhh, got ya,,thanks.
According to this article, the University of Massachusetts-Amherst suit is to "grow marijuana for federally approved researchers".
Not really research.
MAPS (The Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies) has worked with the Marijuana Policy Project on a Congressional sign-on letter to the DEA expressing support for the UMass Amherst license. You're known by your friends -- both MAPS and the MPP are big pro-marijuana, anti-WOD organizations.
There's another agenda at work here, and it has nothing to do with medicine.
Yep.
Will you now be turning yourself in for your "crime"?
Nope. But all the rest of us should.
There does seem to be a "dog in the manger" thing going on. If they can't win an honest debate on the subject, they'll settle for making sure there isn't one.
Wow, did you make that up? That's a damn fine way to put it.
BTW, I haven't seen Cin come back after his on-line confession.
Think he might be toking up?
Kinda obvious, in that it makes no sense.
But, that's "par for the bowling alley" for the phil-ster.
You never did prove your claim that the legal drinking age in FL was 18 in 1968!
Go see the doctor, BOB, about that testicular problem of yours!
How the druggies try to demonize and take it personal when they lose the factual arguments.
Did you follow me to this thread just to hurl slander?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.