Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: TheAngryClam; Chancellor Palpatine
foreign nationals of the same nation of citizenship on both sides of the action (say, a UK subject on both the plaintiff and defendant side) does not violate complete diversity.

I always thought that made logical sense. The whole idea behind diversity is that it is supposed to prevent a Georgia resident from being discriminated against in a Florida court, for example. Presumably, neither state nor federal courts would be any more or less friendly to a citizen of the UK. I remember this discussion in law school.

Too bad Posner will not be on the SCOTUS- he wrote a law review article supporting a market in adoptable babies. Talk about something that would look really bad in a confirmation hearing.

273 posted on 10/24/2003 12:08:06 PM PDT by Modernman ("I'm just a simple man, trying to make my way in the universe."- Jango Fett)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies ]


To: Modernman
That whole circuit is pretty neat in terms of its folks.
280 posted on 10/24/2003 12:09:50 PM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson