Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How We Got Fluoridated
Stop Fluoridation USA ^ | Unknown | Philip Heggen

Posted on 11/22/2002 7:33:34 PM PST by FormerLurker

 
 
 
                              stop fluoridation
 

How We Got Fluoridated

by Philip Heggen

Preface

Throughout the world, and from the beginning, virtually all living creatures have been exposed to fluoride. It's nothing new. Fluoride is one of the most abundant elements in the earth's crust - cumulative and toxic to all forms of life at remarkably low dosage.

Sixty years ago U.S. dental researchers had identified areas in sixteen states where disfiguring mottled enamel was a serious problem. Thirty years ago, the World Health Organization had noted that high concentrations of fluoride are found in areas of every continent and that dental fluorosis is a problem from Finland to South Africa and from England to Japan.

But fluoride affects more than just developing teeth. Even dinosaurs have ingested water and vegetation contaminated by fluoride from volcanic gases and ash - and suffered the consequence in terms of painful arthritic effects.

Industrial mining and manufacturing, like mini-volcanoes, bring up fluorides from the earth into the biosphere, with similar effects on human communities. In the past century or so, man has spawned these "mini-volcanoes" without fully understanding the consequences. Modern well-drilling equipment has provided much needed water from deep within the earth - and this, too, has resulted in fluoride poisoning.

Fluoridation has not been a conspiracy in the usual sense of the word ... but rather, a colossal blunder.

"The problem is enormous, unbelievable," says Andezhath Susheela of the Fluorosis Research and Rural Development Foundation in Delhi, India. She has been unraveling the national story for a decade during which time her estimate of the number of people leading "a painful and crippled life" from fluorosis has risen from one million to 25 million and now to 60 million - six million of them children - spread across tens of thousands of communities. "In some villages three-quarters of the population are seriously affected."

This paper is a chronicle and overview spanning the history of modern industry. It shows the rise of fluoride pollution and how economic motives have overridden concerns for human health. We take you back to the early metal refinery pollution in Europe and show the record of lawsuits for fluoride damage. This reveals the basis for American industry's fear of being shut down by lawsuits. We also document the steps taken by industry to divert public attention away from fluoride air pollution. This chronicle shows that the origin of water fluoridation is in these fluoride fears of industry -- not in concern for children's teeth.

During the 1940s, the development of the atom bomb required handling huge amounts of fluoride in the production of nuclear weapons. Documented here is a major safety study by the Atomic Energy Commission. As a result of this extensive study, the federal government became involved in the suppression of information about fluoride poisoning. Formerly restricted government documents now made available under the Freedom of Information Act have filled in blank spaces in this chronology.

Thus, both big government and big industry, for different reasons, became involved in the cover up. The succeeding collaboration of industry and government is documented below in detail.

The difficulties in maintaining a deception over an extended time are sizable. This is especially true with an ongoing issue like fluoridation. A compounding of dishonest statements and actions is required to maintain the original deception. At a certain point, the truth of the situation becomes obvious. These consequences are now coming to bear on the defenders of fluoridation. The Epilogue deals with this coming confrontation.

Introduction
home


       
 
 
 


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 401-420 next last
To: FormerLurker
And sunflower kernels cure cancer, eh, doc? LOL!
81 posted on 11/22/2002 11:20:03 PM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
You do know that according to the Physicians Desk Reference that I referred to, it states that fluoride causes atopic dermatis right? Did you check the CDC link in relation to the smallpox vaccine that I linked right after it? It states that those with that condition SHOULD NOT take the smallpox vaccine, as it can lead to SERIOUS complications.

Did you check the CDC site and look at the images of what happens to those that receive the vaccine that have that condition?

82 posted on 11/22/2002 11:26:01 PM PST by FormerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
From the 1991 Physicians' Desk Reference

The 1991 Physicians' Desk Reference cautions : "Dental Fluorosis [mottling] may result from exceeding the recommended dose. In hypersensitive individuals, fluorides occasionally cause skin eruptions such as atopic dermatitis, eczema or urticaria, gastric distress, headache, and weaknesshave also been reported. These hypersensitive reactions usually disappear promptly after discontinuation of the fluoride. In rare cases, a delay in the eruption of teeth has been reported."

I find it highly interesting that the very conditions that cause adverse reactions to the smallpox vaccine are due to fluoride.

Who Should NOT Receive the Smallpox Vaccine?

83 posted on 11/22/2002 11:28:30 PM PST by FormerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: FormerLurker
Fluoride is a toxin, so ANY amount is too much.

While I'm not familiar with the medical definition of "toxin," I do know that it's not the toxin that kills ya -- it's the dose. Even this anti-fluoride activist agrees with me (WSJ article, both sides may enjoy). And after briefly scanning this PDF, I'm not terribly worried.

84 posted on 11/22/2002 11:37:08 PM PST by Caesar Soze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: FormerLurker
I understand that hydrogen oxide is poisonous if ingested in sufficient quantities.
85 posted on 11/22/2002 11:37:26 PM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: July 4th
Unfortunately, that's a little difficult for most, since it's not just "crap" that has sugar. The sugars in the major "summer" fruits outpace many candies, and can cause the same tooth decay. Frankly, I'd rather brush with fluoride than give up a nice juicy peach.

It's "refined" sugar that's the culprit. I don't buy that myself, figuring it's in enough stuff I might eat inadvertently (like the odd cookie). But living where it's always summer, I have about 3-4 fruit smoothies per week, and I have yet to see my first cavity. It's been decades since I regularly used fluoride toothpaste or drank any water that wasn't bottled spring water, so all that fruit sugar in all those smoothies must be pretty harmless.

86 posted on 11/22/2002 11:39:03 PM PST by phroebe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Caesar Soze
While I'm not familiar with the medical definition of "toxin," I do know that it's not the toxin that kills ya -- it's the dose. Even this anti-fluoride activist agrees with me (WSJ article, both sides may enjoy). And after briefly scanning this PDF, I'm not terribly worried.

Would you be terribly worried if you ate, drank, and breathed lead? You shouldn't be, as it's LESS toxic than FLUORIDE. Fluoride IS a poison, and has no redeeming qualities whatsoever. Read the article, read my links..

87 posted on 11/22/2002 11:40:28 PM PST by FormerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: wimpycat
Everything AA-OK!
88 posted on 11/22/2002 11:46:38 PM PST by TLI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
I understand that hydrogen oxide is poisonous if ingested in sufficient quantities.

For one, water is NOT scientifically referred to as "hydrogen oxide". It is not an oxide, but rather a true molecule, rather than a ionic formula unit. It has a valence bond versus a ionic bond.

Now that we've gone past that, you do realize that water is essential to life, right? That is in stark contrast to that which has NO nutrional value, as fluoride does not assist or aid in ANY celluar activity, rather it IMPEDES cellular activity in the way of neurotransmission and ion channel processes. It bonds with calcium in bones, causing skeletal fluorosis. It is lethal to small children in the amounts used in fluoride treatments. It has NO benefit, and is a highly reactive toxin. Do you see a bit of a difference here?

89 posted on 11/22/2002 11:47:15 PM PST by FormerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

Hmm, not very good grammer in my last post..

It is not an oxide, but rather is instead a true molecule, rather than a ionic formula unit. It has a valence bond versus a ionic bond.

90 posted on 11/23/2002 12:03:32 AM PST by FormerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
I understand that hydrogen oxide is poisonous if ingested in sufficient quantities.

Incidently CJ, if water WAS an ionic compound, it'd be called hydrogen dioxide.

91 posted on 11/23/2002 12:32:24 AM PST by FormerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
Incidently CJ, if water WAS an ionic compound, it'd be called hydrogen dioxide.

Duh, I meant to say dihydrogen oxide Well it's just not called that. It's called H2O, or simply water...

92 posted on 11/23/2002 12:40:58 AM PST by FormerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: FormerLurker
While millions die from malaria, Algore bans DDT to save the 'Red Breasted Coat Hanger'
93 posted on 11/23/2002 12:49:12 AM PST by rockfish59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerLurker
If I ate, drank, and breathed lead in sufficient quantities to cause detrimental effects to my person, I'd certainly be worried. But I don't. Neither do I eat, drink, or breath sufficient quantities of fluoride ions to negatively impact my life in any measurable way. The news and journal articles I have read, as well as the discussion on the JunkScience.com forum, tell me that I will never have to worry about such things. I'll look at some of your stuff, but only after I get a grounding in fact so I can detect the woo-woo factor if present.
94 posted on 11/23/2002 1:27:17 AM PST by Caesar Soze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Lester Moore
...where the flouride/few cavities link was first determined.

Colorado Springs, 1901, Frederick S. McKay. I think that is El Paso county, Co.

There's a good history and description at the linked site.

Fluoride is toxic, but who in their right mind would injest 6 tubes of toothpaste or drink 5000 gallons of water at once? Fear of Fluoride is irrational, greenpeace junk science.

95 posted on 11/23/2002 2:51:51 AM PST by PeaceBeWithYou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

Comment #96 Removed by Moderator

To: Caesar Soze
If I ate, drank, and breathed lead in sufficient quantities to cause detrimental effects to my person, I'd certainly be worried. But I don't. Neither do I eat, drink, or breath sufficient quantities of fluoride ions to negatively impact my life in any measurable way.

You obviously haven't read much of the information that I've provided either directly or that which I've linked.

The news and journal articles I have read, as well as the discussion on the JunkScience.com forum, tell me that I will never have to worry about such things. I'll look at some of your stuff, but only after I get a grounding in fact so I can detect the woo-woo factor if present.

Those who say that you NEED to ingest fluoride ARE the ones practicing JUNK SCIENCE. You really SHOULD read through the main article, there's a link to the rest of it titled, Introduction.

Clicking the above link will work just as well. The other two links provided in the remarks section are of extremely high value as well..

THEN, there's the rest of thread.

97 posted on 11/23/2002 6:00:18 AM PST by FormerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

Comment #98 Removed by Moderator

Comment #99 Removed by Moderator

Comment #100 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 401-420 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson