Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Too sexy for her rocker
Salon ^ | Mar 28 2002 | Michael Castleman

Posted on 03/28/2002 2:11:17 AM PST by 2Trievers

Betty Dodson, 72, and Eric Wilkinson, 25, are not Harold and Maude, but their age difference invites comparisons. When they became an item three years ago, friends teased them about the movie -- which appeared several years before Wilkinson was born.

"I never even heard of it till I got involved with Betty," Wilkinson explains. "But there's no comparison. Harold and Maude were just friends. We're lovers. We've spent entire days in bed together."

"Oh sure, we got Harold-and-Maude teasing," Betty recalls. "So, I'm so much older. But so what? When men have girlfriends or marry much younger women, no one bats an eye. But the other way around is a big deal. What we have here is a sexual double standard. The teasing stopped pretty quickly when our friends and families accepted our relationship. In our social circle, things feel comfortable now."

Dodson and Wilkinson live together in her apartment on Manhattan's East Side. They also work together: Dodson has produced several sex education videos and sex toys. Wilkinson handles the business end, tracking their sales and working with the webmaster to keep Dodson's Web site current. Their relationship is not like most, but some of the lessons they've learned together would intrigue any couple.

When Dodson first announced that she'd spent a weekend having fabulous sex with the man she affectionately calls her "young pup," her friends were less incredulous about their age difference than they were about the fact that Wilkinson was male. Dodson hadn't had sex with a man for 10 years.

Dodson is not your ordinary senior citizen. She has a Ph.D. in sexology, has been one of America's leading sex educators for more than 30 years and is the author of the minor classic "Sex for One." She has also been the nation's most outspoken advocate of masturbation and critic of what she has dismissed as "codependent partner sex." That's why her friends were so amazed by her tryst. For the first time in many years, the godmother of masturbation was doing it consistently with a man. Next fall, the author of "Sex for One" releases "Orgasms for Two," which, she says, she "would not have written without Eric. I'd never write a sex book about something I wasn't currently doing."

Some matches are made in heaven. Dodson and Wilkinson's was made in bed. "When we first got together," Wilkinson explains, "we didn't have many work projects going, so for a good year and a half, we had plenty of time for lots and lots of sex. Then the work side got busier -- 'Orgasms for Two' was a big job, and running Betty's business took time and energy. Like any couple, more work has meant less time for sex. But we still have great sex regularly, and still enjoy each other a great deal."

Dodson says that other factors have contributed to their recent sexual moderation: "Hey, I'm feeling my years. I still love sex, but I can't fuck around the clock like I used to. Sexual frequency isn't the issue. It's sexual quality, and after three years, that's still great. Sometimes we have quickies. Sometimes we spend all morning in bed sharing orgasms. Sometimes we don't fuck for a while. It depends on what's happening. Of course, we also masturbate. I walked into the living room the other day, and Eric was beating off to some porn. And I keep a vibrator within easy reach.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

1 posted on 03/28/2002 2:11:17 AM PST by 2Trievers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers
Okay, waaaaaaaay too early in the morning for my brain to handle this.
2 posted on 03/28/2002 2:13:48 AM PST by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
You don't have a "headache" do you, Riley? Maybe tomorrow?
3 posted on 03/28/2002 2:16:09 AM PST by 2Trievers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers
No, I am never prone to 'headaches'. Well, except after reading that last paragraph.
4 posted on 03/28/2002 2:18:15 AM PST by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
Salon ... on the cutting edge of pop culture. Did you hear that giant flushing sound too?
5 posted on 03/28/2002 2:22:14 AM PST by 2Trievers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers
More like "Saloon", inebriated with excess and in the cultural loo, ready to regurgitate. ;)

Regards, Ivan

6 posted on 03/28/2002 2:48:24 AM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers
EEUUOOHHH! Disgusting.
7 posted on 03/28/2002 3:10:11 AM PST by JamesWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: 2Trievers
can i give you my heartfelt thanks for not posting any pix?
9 posted on 03/28/2002 3:18:01 AM PST by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: one_particular_harbour
Yeah, right. As if that's possible.
10 posted on 03/28/2002 3:25:58 AM PST by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers
It is pretty early to read this.
11 posted on 03/28/2002 3:27:14 AM PST by ThinkingMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: 2Trievers
Honest to God, reading these comments without my first cup of coffee I couldn't figure out what the hell everyone was getting all grossed out about...then I went back and read the first line over, and over,,and then I found it..72 & 25???????????????? EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
13 posted on 03/28/2002 3:36:34 AM PST by Neets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: one_particular_harbour
Yea it sure does..arf arf arf...
15 posted on 03/28/2002 3:39:51 AM PST by Neets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: one_particular_harbour; xsmommy; ThinkingMan; MadIvan; JamesWilson; riley1992
Wait a minute guys ...as icky as this article is, and considering the source ...

May/Decmember relationships between older men and younger women get an wink and a nod ... what is so wrong about vice versa?

16 posted on 03/28/2002 3:40:33 AM PST by 2Trievers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers
May and December can be fine in any combination but a 50 year age span is a bit much! Ya got your Oedipus, but is there a Greek tragedy with a grandma spin to it?
17 posted on 03/28/2002 3:43:12 AM PST by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers
There is virtually nothing wrong with it. It was the detail overload in the story that got to me, and not in a good way I might add. LOL
18 posted on 03/28/2002 3:45:24 AM PST by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: xsmommy
I say love the one you're with ... don't deny anyone this kind of happiness ... as long as I can't see it ... why would I care?
20 posted on 03/28/2002 3:46:38 AM PST by 2Trievers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson