Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DuncanWaring

It depends what the goal of defeating Japan was. If it was the reason the US and British gave for cutting off their oil supplies before Pearl Harbor, i.e. end Japanese imperialism in Asia, that was already accomplished by forcing them back to their own island. If the goal was (for the first time in American history) unconditional surrender of an enemy, well unprecedented demands cause unprecedented resistance which could only be overcome with an unprecedented response.

An excellent examination of this topic (available from JSTOR):

Hiroshima and the Historians: History as Relative Truth, KENNETH B. PYLE, The Pacific Northwest Quarterly , Summer 2013, Vol. 104, No. 3 (Summer 2013), pp. 123-132


244 posted on 05/05/2024 2:54:28 PM PDT by edwinland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies ]


To: edwinland

In hindsight, the fight between Japan and China was over who would control Asia.

Knowing what we know now, I would have much rather had the Japanese in charge than Communist China. China is doing their own version of the “Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere”.


245 posted on 05/05/2024 2:58:07 PM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson