I really could not believe that the USSC ruled that Texas did not have standing to sue to Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin for not following their election laws.
If those states broadly ignored laws passed by their legislatures and that led to a tainted ballot count and caused the election to be thrown to a given candidate different than that of Texas and the states that joined the suit how could Texas not have standing?
Who possibly could have standing to challenge these unlawful elections?
When a state does not follow their election laws what recourse does another state have?
What is the point of having USSC if it is not to resolve conflicts between the states.
According to several Courts... No one. At least, not until Trumps margin of victory this fall is even greater than the fraud perpetrated against him last time and the Dems try taking the results to court...