To: Pure Country
Using this logic....then you should have a tax deduction nine months prior to birth....both on state/federal taxes. For some reason, I don’t see either being agreeable to that. Plus....would someone issue a ssn for the embryo?
To: pepsionice
Those are political and prudential decisions. There is no moral imperative to issue a SSN to someone at birth. I didn’t get mine until I got my first job at 17 years old.
9 posted on
02/23/2024 10:41:34 AM PST by
scouter
(As for me and my household... We will serve the LORD.)
To: pepsionice
Using this logic....then you should have a tax deduction nine months prior to birth....both on state/federal taxes. For some reason, I don’t see either being agreeable to that. Plus....would someone issue a ssn for the embryo?And using that logic ... US Tax Law supersedes God's law.
18 posted on
02/23/2024 12:52:54 PM PST by
al_c
(Democrats: Party over Common Sense)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson