Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Pure Country

Using this logic....then you should have a tax deduction nine months prior to birth....both on state/federal taxes. For some reason, I don’t see either being agreeable to that. Plus....would someone issue a ssn for the embryo?


7 posted on 02/23/2024 10:35:59 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: pepsionice

Those are political and prudential decisions. There is no moral imperative to issue a SSN to someone at birth. I didn’t get mine until I got my first job at 17 years old.


9 posted on 02/23/2024 10:41:34 AM PST by scouter (As for me and my household... We will serve the LORD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: pepsionice
Using this logic....then you should have a tax deduction nine months prior to birth....both on state/federal taxes. For some reason, I don’t see either being agreeable to that. Plus....would someone issue a ssn for the embryo?

And using that logic ... US Tax Law supersedes God's law.

18 posted on 02/23/2024 12:52:54 PM PST by al_c (Democrats: Party over Common Sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson