Posted on 03/08/2023 2:09:58 PM PST by nickcarraway
In most states, if the owner has been paying property taxes every year, nobody can lay any type of claim to the land.
At least in California, a squatter cannot get granted adverse possession if the squatter hasn’t paid the property taxes for the 10 yr period
You actually read the story...
Fifteen years may as well be “in perpetuity,” for all intents and purposes.
Word to the wise: Always have a contract in writing when you let your neighbor use your property like this.
In Delaware it doesn’t matter if you were paying the taxes or there was questionable adverse possession, all it takes is a judge making a case for the claimant and you’ve lost the land to a scumbag who never paid for the land or had a deed to it. Been there.
It costs a fortune to fight it in court and appeal it so you lose money and your land is still stolen.
Nope...not even a consideration for adverse possession.
Melissa schlonged him.
I watched a shed being moved 5 ft...They winched it and got rid of one nasty encroachement. I’m surprised the Towwn lt you put a shed on line...most have say 3’ to 10’ setbacks.
I have a question: If he had gone to a lawyer first, when this started recently, could anything have been done?
I wonder if these same laws apply to building a small shack out on Federal land somewhere and after so many years without ever being discovered it becomes your property?
HAAAAAA!
california property taxes are a consideration....
In California, adverse possession occurs when a person who wants to claim someone else’s land must not only use it for at least five years, but they must also pay property taxes on it. Dimmick v Dimmick 58 Cal.
If you knowingly encroach...you're pretty stupid. Is the land yours?? Most towns require a survey to put up a structure...including fences.
Nope....this is a very typical happening.
We had a house built 5 feet over the lot line. The adjoiner and the Town had no sympathy...and they were 100% right....Tear it down...no C Of O and one big lawsuit.
You’re quite right as far as Ca goes. I shouldn’t speak so broadly...every state is different.
of course not... that is... uh... different! Right?
Sleep (or actually living) on the property is not a requirement in any state I am aware of - only the use of and/or “improvements” (that could include simply mowing a spot... or setting up a goat pen, apparently).
Yet the entire process enables the government to take form the landowner without compensation... unlawful taking is theft.
A pet wolf would solve the goat problem.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.