Europe is the immoral insane asylum, even without the Muslim invasion:
Professor recommends using women’s corpses to carry children
https://vesti7.ru/video/2558864/episode/05-02-2023/
Translated excerpt:
In a scientific article, a Norwegian professor recommends using women’s corpses to carry children. Russian television broadcast a very clear comment on this.
It’s no joke: a Norwegian professor has in all seriousness recommended using women’s corpses to carry babies. It is clear that this does not go down well in Russia, where conservative values prevail and transhumanism is massively criticized. Russian TV aired a stark comment on this in its weekly news review on Sunday....
There’s a new word in Western bioethics. Anna Smajdor, a philosophy professor at the University of Oslo in Norway, suggests implanting dead women with embryos to develop them until childbirth.
“We cannot yet completely abandon the womb for our species to reproduce, but we can transfer the risks of childbirth to those who are no longer harmed by it,” says the professor.
Anna Smajdor’s work was published in the journal Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. The point is that a body is considered dead anywhere in the world once brain death has been determined. This may happen suddenly — as a result of a heart attack, a stroke or a life-threatening head injury. However, if acted upon quickly, medical life support systems can keep the body circulating and breathing for as long as one wants.
And if so, a dead woman is formally ready to be a surrogate. She can be artificially inseminated on the right days, or her eggs can be used for artificial insemination. And one can implant a live embryo in the uterus of the surrogate and feed the body of the dead surrogate via tubes, monitor the blood values and the normal development of the fetus and, when the time comes, perform a cesarean section. The baby is alive and the surrogate goes to a better place. Or, if the technique of vegetative life support allows and the body is sufficiently intact, there is a new pregnancy.
Anna Smajdor anticipates the objections of feminists, who already object to seeing woman merely as a container for children, but here is a mere container, with no superfluous functions. The Oslo professor, who advocates for gender equality, also says that dead men can give birth to children — men who no longer have a brain but still have a liver. A liver, it turns out, can also function as a uterus.
“Men can also take part in the ‘whole body donation for pregnancy’. Pregnancy can also occur outside the uterus. The liver is a promising implantation site due to its excellent blood supply. This can be risky, even fatal, for the human carrying the fetus, but for brain-dead donors the term ‘lethal’ is meaningless,” writes Smajdor.
In general, according to the Norwegian professor, “pregnancy itself, in the strict sense, should be medically contraindicated for women.” According to this logic, if it is unhealthy to live, one should give part of one’s vital functions to the dead. Admittedly, this is not yet allowed in any country in the world, but the initiative is there and so is the expertise. For this reason, Professor Smajdor opposes what she calls “excessive moral sensitivity.”
In 2019, Portugal’s talented, internationally successful athlete and professional canoeist Catarina Sequeira gave birth to a son, three months after she was diagnosed with brain death after a sudden asthma attack. The boy was born healthy. The life-sustaining measures were discontinued for the mother that day.
The current initiative from Norway has understandably caused a stir. The gay community is for it, because a path to procreation without women is emerging. Without living women. After all, surrogates are very expensive these days: the price is in the $100,000 range, a dead woman comes cheaper. And she doesn’t bitch, either.
But there are also skeptics. Manchester native Tom Farr wrote on Twitter that he “can’t think of anything more horrible, dystopian, and a better sign of society’s total moral decay than to ‘harvest’ the bodies of dead women and keep them ‘alive’ as surrogate mothers.”
And Ashlyn O’Mara of Toronto, Canada, compared Professor Smajdor’s article to Huxley’s dystopia Brave New World, in which babies are born in artificial wombs produced on an assembly line.
However, Smajdor, a philosophy professor at the University of Oslo, is not discouraged. She relies on her clear beliefs that compassion is “not a necessary part” of healthcare. Point. Well, that’s what we’re dealing with, the peculiarities of Western thought. And in a wide variety of situations. This includes, for example, the attitude towards Ukraine; you have to understand that.
*******
Europe is dying due to demographics and with transhumanistic belief starting to be discussed as something mainstream and worth pursuing the decline can’t come fast enough. No morals, empty souls. As one commenter stated this reminded them of “Hellstrom’s Hive” by Frank Herbert, which was a warning. The usual nihilistic community members are all for this naturally.