Posted on 01/22/2023 1:00:10 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
Mark Twain is often misattributed as saying, “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.” The sentiment is definitely Twainesque, but he never said it. Nevertheless, it’s still true and demonstrable time and again in our post-truth society.
As more “normies” have started waking up to the reality that the Covid-19 “vaccines” are ineffective and dangerous, a lot are finding news way of defending their decisions to get jabbed rather than admitting it was a mistake. Conservative comic Scott Adams, who is most famous for creating the Dilbert comics, is not one of those people. He’s now admitting that “anti-vaxxers won” in regards to their decision.
In fact, he admitted it over and over again. Watch:
(Excerpt) Read more at youtu.be ...
NO ONE analyzes every action they take. You do not have time for that and wouldn't make it out of the house-door on your way to work.
That said, making these assumptions and being on cruise control (mind shut off) is one thing if we're tasking about toothpaste or using a towel to dry off with, what nail clipper to use... We assume and trust that these will be safe to use and work like they always have for the past decades in our life.
However, laying such trust and being on cruise control when you're talking about a pharma industry and in particular company (Pfizer) that has been shown to act unethically in the past, a government which is in bed with these big corporations, and where life limb or eyesight are at stake, is foolish.
That is exactly when you should be asking questions. And if the answers are that the numbers are inflated for Covid fatalities, the vaccine was rushed to market and not fully tested, using a method for development not used for vaccines in the past (mRNA)... it soon becomes a case where you laying blind “faith” in government and pharma that they got it right. Rather than being on the side of logic and reason, you are on the side of mass consensus (group think) and giving into token incentives or coercive pressures (carrots and sticks).
Your quote has been making me chuckle all night.
It's so accurate.
1. Create deadly virus in lab. 2. Virus kills myriads of people. 3. Create vaccine that can sometimes also kill people.Pincer move. We are dealing with utter demons.
Do not ever get a vaccination again.
Tell everyone else too.
The Dilbert guy admits “The Anti-Vaxxers Win” but he still is for the shots.....
The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.
I am ready for yet another booster!!
It’s Not A Booster. It is The 4th Shot Of A Product That Already Failed Three Times.…
No. I caught a very mild case, once.
Easily take that over blood clots, thankee.
i liked dilbert from inception. knew little about adams otherwise until 2016.
since then I have concluded that he has a really thin skin, usually very well hidden.
there is a very detailed story about him going onto a board he was being trashed on years ago (pre-trump) to defend himself.
with the garrison cartoon, he initially played it off while *fact-checking a parody*
around new years he just starting insulting garrison over this same cartoon non-stop. I think we see the real scott adams in those posts.
i didn’t watch his mea culpa (I consume almost no video news). based on everything, he still is somewhat subscribing to the position (so nicely illustrated by garrison) that folks not getting vaxed were stupid but right, accidentally.
Thank you!
The corrupt portion of the Government is in bed with Pfizer and company.
What irks me about Adams is reminds me of my uncle who is a very smart, educated, and successful guy, but he occasionally gets things wrong and is loathe to admit it. It’s an ego thing with these guys and just makes them look foolish when they continue to try and rationalize their former position, unwilling to ever admit they might have been wrong.
Even the smartest among us occasionally gets it wrong, we are all just human. Adams certainly isn’t stupid, but neither is he infallible when it comes to his understanding of certain issues and I wish he would just accept that instead of his endless excuses as to why he did what he did. He wanted to travel internationally and took his chance with the vaxx, and now regrets that decision only now because he is experiencing vaxx damage. (Can’t walk up his stairs, is tired and unable to function after 3pm ect) He reminds me of a doctor I know who was all pro vaxx, any refusal was irrational, blah blah blah. That is until he himself was injured by the second vaxx, whereupon he quickly did a 180 degree turn. Scott needs to humble himself a little.
It certainly has been sliced and diced!
wondering why you never responded to post #102 by fr_freak?
he has vax damage? (wondered if he did, he had to have a reason to flip on them)
concerning that this took over a year? to appear, assuming he had no boosters. did he talk in detail about it? maybe i will have to watch the video.
I think at this point almost all of us who are unvaxed still have skin in the game. immediate family, parents/siblings/kids etc. I am profoundly worried about those in my circle who vaxed (and even more those who boosted).
his insistence that no one made a better informed decision than him is just a bruised ego? even a basic knowledge of normal FDA procedures would inform one that they were going out of their way to not find any issues with this product, and that was before I even knew it was a new technology platform not used on humans before. additionally, even cursory googling on issues with SARS1 vaccines and coronvirus vaccine attempts in general would bring up several important issues with apparently no actual answers.
I do not have a medical background and I knew this much.
ok so I did watch the clip but also read up, he apparently has the issues you describe and has for some time - has he openly connected them to the vax yet? brain fog, activity intolerance.....one can only assume he has had a comprehensive work-up by multiple specialists, though who knows how much good that does in CA these days.
in general it is worrisome because it is a public figure actually talking about what are (at this point) non-lethal issues which nonetheless ruin his life, and may well be vax injuries.
If I am right in the above, at some point he is going to come out and declare himself vax injured. he is getting there if he hasn’t already.
I don’t follow him myself, I got the info from his followers that he received vaxx damage and that was what caused him to admit that the vaxx is causing problems in many people. We can’t do much about those already vaxxed, but there was clear fraud involved, there’s plenty of evidence now that they messed with the data purposely and did all manner of scumbag things during the trials. There were 3 unvaxxed pregnant women in the trials with pneumonia that they didn’t treat with antibiotics and who died, they did this purposely to rig the data so that the unvaxxed would appear more at risk. I mean this stuff is just beyond evil, we can’t let them get away with it. That $80 billion Moderna pocketed and whatever Pfizer made should go to the victims who were injured by this fraud. If we ignore it they will just consider us suckers and feel free to pull this fraud again with the future mRNA vaxxes they are already planning. Most people have no idea just how evil and sleazy this whole scam was.
i have worried/suspected that one of the many benefits of a major war will be being able to wash this problem away, both legally and possibly symptomatically (introduce confounding factors).
in other words, this awkward period where people are starting to realize there is a problem is temporary. there is a plan to cut it short.
I’m afraid you’re probably right, they will use the war to distract us from this and stay in denial as long as they can. But there are some good people out there who want to expose the truth and I hope they succeed and justice is ultimately done.
Sorry for the slow response.
The ONLY type of "unvaccinated" person, then, who will present himself to any health organization will be, BY DEFINITION, one who requires treatment. That skews the data on a parabolic trajectory.
Not really, because, likewise, the only vaccinated person in this study who will be counted also requires treatment.
The population being studied is those who required hospitalization.
The question is simple. Of those who required hospitalization for Covid how many were vaccinated vs. not and what’s the underlying vaccination rate in that population.
I think you might have missed the most important element:
The exact number of “vaccinated” is known, because they track those people once they’ve received the jab
The exact number of “unvaccinated” is unknown because nobody comes in and says “Hi I’m not getting the jab!”
the true rate of hospitalization would be (# of hospitalized)/total number of people, and “total number of people” of “unvaccinated” is greatly underestimated, by factors of ten most likely.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.