Posted on 11/20/2022 12:12:33 PM PST by grundle
This mom read a pornographic book available at her kid's school to the school board and they got upset because a child was in the room
It's true what they say: You truly cannot make this stuff up.
[Warning: Strong Sexual Content That's Probably In Your Kid's School]
Video at https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1593036241322512385
UNREAL. Parent in @friscoisd reads from a pornographic book available to kids. A board member stops her and says “there’s a child in our board room.”
They acknowledge it’s inappropriate to read in front of children but these books can be in the school library. Make it make sense
There's a child in our boardroom, so I'd like for you to please stop reading that.
Ya think?!
He meant to say there is a child molester in our boardroom.
Send the books to their children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews for Christmas
“available to kids”
What does this mean?
Every state needs DeSantis ... In Florida we don’t put up with this crap.
At what point are some of these parents going to show up at these board meetings with petitions to recall all of these board members?
It means the book is available to be checked out in the library. It says that in the linked article.
They don’t care about protecting kids. They only care about protecting and enabling the pedophile faggots that prey on them.
This ping list is for the other articles of interest to homeschoolers about education and public school. This can occasionally be a fairly high volume list. Articles pinged to the Another Reason to Homeschool List will be given the keyword of ARTH. (If I remember. If I forget, please feel free to add it yourself)
The main Homeschool Ping List handles the homeschool-specific articles. I hold both the Homeschool Ping List and the Another Reason to Homeschool Ping list. Please freepmail me to let me know if you would like to be added to or removed from either list, or both.
“It means the book is available to be checked out in the library. It says that in the linked article.”
It says “These books can be in the library”. It doesn’t say that book is in the library.
If it is available at the school as she contends or is available from other school libraries in the network as happens, it is available.
Do you contend she is lying?
Her exact words. Do you think she would go up in front of a school board and say that if it weren't in the library as she states?
What is your issue in contesting this? Do you think she shouldn't be making an issue of it? Or that the material she is referencing isn't "pornographic"?
Do you think this is no big deal?
Unfortunately, I get the impression there are many people on our side as well who feel that this deliberate sexualization of children is not an issue.
They seem to want to frame people who object to books that talk graphically and in great detail about foreplay and oral sex as “book burners” and “prudes”.
Parents have every right to be angry about this.
They bought it for them. Make them listen to it.
“At what point are some of these parents going to show up at these board meetings with petitions to recall all of these board members?”
Already started. Check out Moms For Liberty. https://www.momsforliberty.org/
They’ve been infiltrating school boards now for a few months, and have had some great successes.
Most likely the board member needed a delay in order to assemble a full group of children to attend the reading.
What do you think it means? It’s in the school library.
Nice
many people on our side as well who feel that this deliberate sexualization of children is not an issue.
./\
Secular humanists appear to worship sigmund Freud after required college psych classes where they are taught sexual inhibitions are the root of all that’s bad in society and crime.
Their mind set is that there is no such thing as bad sex.
Anywhere
Anytime
Any age.
Judeo Christian sexual mores are evil to them.
They have always wanted to be able to say it, can’t , so they just try and rachet the bar little by little until they will be able to say it openly.
We are almost there now.
Today Freud’s largely irrelevant to the pseudoscience psychology. Not that considering him relevant improves things.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.