Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: jeffersondem

Perhaps it was. Or, perhaps the thought was to ride it out until they could propose a Constitutional Amendment that would actually pass.


71 posted on 05/29/2022 11:20:47 AM PDT by cockroach_magoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: cockroach_magoo
“. . . perhaps the thought was to ride it out until they could propose a Constitutional Amendment that would actually pass.”

If there are any insights from the 1856 convention proceedings on how the Republicans figured to get three fourths of the several states to peaceably agree to an abolition amendment - I'd like to learn more about that business model. It would have solved a lot of problems.

In Lincoln's House Divided speech he predicted the end of slavery without specifying how. Since southern states knew Lincoln knew he could not get the super majority needed to peacefully overthrow constitutional slavery, they (southern states) figured he must have something else in mind.

Like confiscatory taxation which required a simple majority in Congress, not a super-majority.

Northern-financed murder raids could also be used to bring pressure.

Refusal to honor the provisions of the constitution which benefited the South could be used to bring pressure.

And, if control of the U.S. military could be obtained by the election of a regional candidate with as little as 39 percent of the vote, then northern options would not be necessarily limited to the peaceful overthrow of constitutional slavery.

72 posted on 05/30/2022 9:16:25 AM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson