Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Keb

“It was not a coincidence that they were all slave states, though.”

That is an interesting comment.

During the Revolutionary War, how many of the 13 states were slave states?

And how many of the original 13 states voted to ratify slavery into the United States Constitution?

And finally, when did the principles of the Declaration of Independence cease to be valid?


62 posted on 05/28/2022 3:21:25 PM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: jeffersondem

Prior to the Revolutionary War, all of the 13 colonies were slave territory. That was British law, and the colonies were under British law. After the war, about half the states banned slavery in pretty short order. I don’t know that any did so during the war.

I don’t know of anything in the Constitution that would be considered as ratifying slavery. The framers of the constitution did specifically bar the Federal Government from limiting the import of slaves for a time, to those states that decided to allow it. Each of the 13 states agreed to this, but it seems to be more accepting a necessary compromise than necessarily liking it.

I’m not clear on the meaning of the “validity of the principles of the Declaration” question. The declaration was never a law, and never had the force of law, but the principles it contained remained generally accepted.

In mentioning that only slave states tried to secede, I was referring to this: The first wave of secession was specifically to preserve the institution of slavery, by those who felt that the election of an abolitionist president increased the threat to slavery to a “too high” level. (Lincoln specifically stated that he did not intend to use the federal power to interfere with slavery in the extant states, as he considered that the Federal Government did not have that authority. But the tales that were told about him in some Southern newspapers made him an ogre that was going to attack any slave state, by means lawful or unlawful. How much the real Lincoln would have scared the southerners we will never know, but the imaginary Lincoln was considered so obviously unendurable that he buffaloed half a dozen states into trying to secede before he even showed up.)

The second wave of secession was specifically in reaction to Lincoln raising troops to re-establish federal law within the states of the first wave. The states in the second wave were willing to remain in the United States for now, but only if the United States granted that any state, which would include them, could leave whenever she wished. It was only slave states that considered it so important to open the exit, that they would fight any attempt to close it. Not all slave states were willing to fight to open the exit from the union, but no free state even considered it. How much the desire to protect slavery fed into their desire to open the exit, is not so easy to distinguish, at least for me. It certainly played some part.


65 posted on 05/28/2022 7:47:45 PM PDT by Keb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson