Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jane Long; gas_dr
Unjabbed protection, against death: 72%
Jabbed protection, against death: 67%
OVERALL protection (for UNjabbed, and jabbed): 69%
Take that, FRAUDci and the FR $hot $hills

Don't forget this party, Janey (take notes, gassie)....

But the risk of ivermectin is negligible so the risk-benefit ratio is extremely favorable. Ivermectin has a 3X effect size (benefit) and is more than 100,000X less risky with respect to death risk, killing nobody (compared to over 200,000 people from the vaccine). So it’s the clear choice. It’s the only rational choice.

The moral of this story is; the poison vax kills, ivermectin does not. This FACT is factored in, of course.


38 posted on 02/23/2022 5:37:06 PM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: bagster

First of all Jane has asked that I not respond to her. So please stop pinging her to the posts.

Secondly, I am sorry you cannot understand simple scientific papers. The Jama article open labeled randomized precisely states it’s findings. Now you can twist it and look for penumbras and shadows all you want. But the data are the data. This article and numerous others do not support that ivermectin does much for Covid.

However, in the past week with cases dwindling, I was able to help to relatively early cases with monoclonals. Patents were better the next day. So you are feee to continue to follow this clown who posts on a discredited blog and has very little insight like her is your pied piper. You are free to believe wherever you want.

But it is plain you chose to not understand what is written and have little insight into the disease. The reason why I don’t respond much to you is because you never really add anything to the conversation. But I responded here because I wanted to point out the length that some around here stretch the math beyond its limits to show something that plainly does not exist.

Happily the pandemic is over and there is little use in this ongoing debate.

The fact is ivermectin is weakly effective, if at all. There is no consensus among the studies. You can cherry pick and twist data into pretzels all you want, but the totality of the overall data show a very low level beneficial effect if there is benefit at all

On the other hand there is no question monoclonals are superior treatment on every way to other current of label medication uses.

Have a good night.


39 posted on 02/23/2022 5:50:33 PM PST by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson