23andme said 50% accuracy!! That’s crazy. I could probably LOOK at someone and guess their ancestry with better odds. That was back in 2017 however, and they’re only as good as the information they have to produce the results. Surely they’re better now.
I found this article from 2018 that did kinda what I want to do, send off myself to different tests. He mentioned one I haven’t heard of before; wonder if it’s still around? https://www.livescience.com/63997-dna-ancestry-test-results-explained.html
I”m not sure I would want the medical part of the test either. I already know what my family is predisposed towards; I don’t want to know any more! LOL
Was that you?
_________________________________________________________
Catturd ™
@catturd2
·
21m
Someone coughed in Maine ... let’s shutdown the U.S. economy.
In that video of the Markets the local growers were being pushed out. It also said CA had good protection against that happening there, but I can imagine there are lots of places in the US where this is happening. Especially if it is a BIG market.
In regards to the dna if one has enough money it would be interesting to see what they all come up with from the spit of the same person.
Ancestry had the best results and I think they will continue to because they are the most used so they are able to track more people. They have shown where the different side of my ancestor’s came from and where they settled.