Third Circuit Court of Appeals grants expedited review for Team Trump’s appeal from Pennsylvania

Twitter ^ | 23 NOV 20 | Jenna Ellis

[BlackFemaleArmyColonel]

Third Circuit Court of Appeals grants expedited review for Team Trump’s appeal from Pennsylvania.

[phs3]

The third circuit is now in the hands of Justice Samuel A. Alito!!!!

BOOM!!!

https://www.johnscreekpost.com/circuit-courts-have-been-reassigned-justice-clarence-thomas-to-georgia/

[Dr. Franklin]

I prefer not to disclose too much about myself online. I’ll just call myself a legal academic and keep it vague.

[Jane Long]

I prefer not to disclose too much about myself online. I’ll just call myself a legal academic and keep it vague.

---

Ah....got it.....ok, Mr FRanklin, keep it vague.

Again....welcome to FR....as of 11/17/20

[Jane Long]

Pardon me....I meant Dr FRanklin.

[RummyChick]

Don’t let the sarcasm here get to you.

There are a lot of lawyers on this site that never disclose it.

Same with MDs.

And all kinds of other professions.

LLMs are done for a variety of reasons..including legal theory. And generally require a JD or foreign equivalent.

[RummyChick]

You have had people on this site crap all over you for almost a year about COVID and here you are doing the same thing to someone else because you don’t like what he is saying.

So what if he is new. Shouldnt you welcome new people?

If you do not believe what he is saying then take the words and research it yourself.

Like this:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/294

He says he went to school with Judge Brann. He has given some insight. You can look up the legal things he is saying.

Next time someone craps on you over a post you make about COVID remember what you are doing to this guy

[RummyChick]

And one more thing:

I have gone to school with some of the people that have ended up being discussed on threads. I choose not to disclose it. EVER.

It forms my opinions. In once case, every time I see the name I roll my eyes and say “I can’t believe he made it that far” because I really can’t.

People here do go to school with people you end up seeing in the news.

[Jane Long]

I’m NOT the one who’s had folks “crapping all over me”, rummy chickie.

I think you are talking about yourself, dear.

I NEVER said I don’t like what Dr FRanklin has said. I’ve not really read his posts, much, to be FRank.

I was honestly curious what his expertise credentials are.

So, maybe you need to mind your OWN beeswax. That might keep folks from crapping all over YOUR posts.

[RummyChick]

Your sarcasm tells exactly what you were up to

And yes you have had people crapping all over you..especially the Flu bros

But hey carry on and keep crapping all over Dr Franklin

[RummyChick]

and one more thing..I sure as hell have had people crapping all over me about my opinion of what is going to happen here

And when Powell does NOT keep Biden from being certified..as I predict..you can come admit I was right.

And when Powell does not save the day and have President see 4 more years...you can come apologize to me.

the only way he sees 4 more years is a Con law question...and I have my doubts that SCOTUS is even going to take the case.

[Jane Long]

Get yourself a grip.

I know what YOU are up to, and I’m not playing.

Oh, and catch up, I’ve agreed with the flubros since it became obvious (to most, MONTHS ago) that this whole China Flu is a PlanDEMIc scam to control fearpers.

Now, buzz off.

[Jane Long]

Get professional help.

Seriously.

And, again, buzz off.

[RummyChick]

Why???Because I understand the legal process better than you and understand Powell’s wild accusations are not going to change BIden being certified? For starters, her wild accusations will require discovery. Her accusations may be true...but she is so far from proving them in court.

You, apparently, don’t understand that.

But We will see.

[Bratch]

Dershowitz: Trump Has ‘Two or Three Legal Constitutional Paths’ — ‘I Don’t Think that the Election Is Going to Be Reversed’

---

[...]

DERSHOWITZ: If the evidence is there, then there will be a trial.

Remember also, these have to go to state court first. There’s no such thing as a presidential election. There are 50 state elections. The Pennsylvania case is already in the Supreme Court. But these other cases have to go first through either the state or the federal trial courts before they get to the Supreme Court.

It doesn’t look like there will be enough time to bring the case to the Supreme Court before the safe harbor provision kicks in, before the Electoral College meets.

BARTIROMO: OK.

DERSHOWITZ: So, if you’re asking me what I think the outcome is going to be, notwithstanding the fact that there are legal paths to potential victory, I don’t think that the election is going to be reversed, based on the numbers that I see at the moment and based on the fact that I haven’t seen the evidence.

[...]

---

[Dr. Franklin]

Roberts’ recent vote contributed in no small way to the mess we’re in. If the Supremes fail to clean it up it will be tantamount to condoning widespread fraud, depriving equal protection, and tolerating a lack of transparency. This, of course, would lead to a lack of confidence in the legitimacy of our governing institutions and the severe erosion of faith in the republic itself.

Agreed. I have contempt for people like Roberts who go through life trying not to get any mud on their good white shoes. If nothing is done, things will turn ugly, and it will be his fault.

ACB is in a very difficult situation and might not be the savior we are hoping she will be. What in your estimation are the odds that the Supremes will take steps to restore confidence in our voting systems? Will they recognize the implications for the country and do the right thing, or will they look to sidestep the tough decisions thereby perpetuating the problems?

With ACB, it's all about the appearances. The Justices themselves are not actually subject to recussal rules for lower courts. No one can make her recuse herself if she doesn't feel that is appropriate. If she does recuse herself, it could then depend on getting a vote from the liberal wing. SCOTUS declining to hear a case quickly, before a circuit court panel or rehearing en banc is extremely rare. They like to let things develop as much as possible in the lower courts before deciding anything, especially with something political like unprecedented election disputes.

[RummyChick]

Pretty good article. Maybe it will help some people understand that Powell is not going to be the one to overturn this election.

What she is doing is for future elections..and for various other things.

There is some cache to Trump being the POTUS that the people wanted but the forces were against...and maybe that is the way forward for him.

Certainly, what Powell is doing will help further that along IF she has some hard evidence.

[RummyChick]

Twitter is convinced that SCOTUS denied it just because it wasn’t on the docket this morning. LOL

[Dr. Franklin]

After reading Matt Brann's opinion, it's embarassing that it includes a sentence fragment like, No different here.. Call me a grammar nazi, but that's unprofessional. He has been reversed on appeal and chastised by the Third Circuit, and I wouldn't be surprised to see it happen again.

Relax. I have a thick skin.

[missthethunder]

Statements have already been made
that Powell’s work will go past
the election.

Try to keep up.

Her work is different than Trumps.

Her work is not to stop Biden from being certified.

It is only up to Trumps team to win in court.

FYI only, she is working for you for free/donations.
She is a David up against a giant.
I can’t wait to see what she brings.
But I will give her at least a year
before I crap all over her.

[RummyChick]

I do keep up.

I have had poster after poster after poster tell me I am wrong when I say Powell is not going to be able to stop Biden from becoming President

It has gotten to the point where I just say

We will see
See you at the end

Con Law technicalities are the only things that can save Trump.