“If is too hard for me to uderstand” is not a valid argument.
If it cannot meet the standards of science (and any supernatural explnation cannot) it is of no use to science. You can no more apply supernatural origins to the scientific method than you can pray a 747 into a flight.
Science does not eschew God, there is simply no way to craft a methodology to accomodate Him. Rather, a wise scientist praises Him and the never ending wonders, all of which can be eventually understood and modeled, He provides. And our capability to divine and define them.
As I stated, even the first cell would need the ability to reproduce - and the many items necessary for this to occur would need to be already encoded in the DNA. This would require forethought from the very beginning. Please explain how this logic is flawed.
Furthermore, what are the odds of all of this occurring as a cosmic accident?
We are left with the question, "Does human consciousness and conscience ultimately come from mindlessness?" and the philosophical ramifications of our response - the worldview that follows...