To: Jonty30
I think we can agree that it had nothing to do with caring about the slaves. Go away, sleazebag.
2 posted on
08/12/2020 2:33:18 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(You are in far greater danger from authoritarian government than you are from a seasonal virus.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I’m serious on my point. Liberals have always used the Hegelian Dialectic arguments.
4 posted on
08/12/2020 2:35:06 PM PDT by
Jonty30
(What Islam and secularism have in common is thp at they are both death cults.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Go away, sleazebag.
Here is quote form President Sleazebag.
My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union.
Abraham Lincoln
39 posted on
08/12/2020 3:08:03 PM PDT by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Well, there is that little story about Shermans soldiers Raping the black slave women of Columbia South Carolina. But, we can overlook that one, right?
44 posted on
08/12/2020 3:13:54 PM PDT by
MrChips
("To wisdom belongs the apprehension of eternal things." - St. Augustine)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Learn your history.
The South had coal. The South had cotton. The North wanted them.
73 posted on
08/12/2020 3:46:28 PM PDT by
sauropod
(I will not comply.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I think we can agree that it had nothing to do with caring about the slaves.
To preserve the Union.
91 posted on
08/12/2020 4:09:07 PM PDT by
Don Corleone
(The truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson