This is why I’ve always believed the key here is not to get the “unenlightened”, shall we say, to “believe in Q” per se, but, rather, to answer the questions ... to be shown the things that are covered by “Q” etc.. For example, getting someone to see the unmasking list and the see the “Facebook’s my b!tch” @Snowden video on YouTube ... they will become converts. This is akin to “Q” saying you can tell people or let them see for themselves. Telling people the deep state is evil and vindicated by “Q” only goes so far or nowhere to the most “unenlightened” - but facts are facts - they can disbelieve facts but they cannot deny them. IMO. WWG1WGA :)
Understood. But Q obliQuely linked this article for a reason. So I dug. It Shirley is a long read, but I believe its intent is to inoculate normies against our efforts even if we don’t mention Q.
This a psych war, know your enemy’s intent.
With all my usual disclaimers.