|
|||||||
Posted on 02/17/2020 9:28:57 PM PST by ransomnote
:: which I do NOT find incompatible with my Christianity ::
So, how would this compare to Genesis 3:16b?
Would you like me to PM his tinder contact to you?
He’s interested.
|
|||||||
mark
I agree with your baphomet ‘rant’. They’ve been flaunting this before us for years in Hollywired, methinks. Square jaws and straight figures on women. Note how they how themselves askew, to hide the lack of hips. Wide shoulders with thick forearms; they attempt to hide with poses.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
LONG post -more about portrayal of trans women in advertising.
I remember square jaws used to be rare on hollywood “stars” but now they are far more common. I do know real women with defined jaws, so it’s not that that trait in and of itself is unattractive. I have wondered if women are being conditioned to admire as “beautiful” models/actresses with square jaws without realizing positive memories of men are drawing them to an otherewise masculine trait. I used to wear a fragrance called “KL” that some found too masculine - I wondered then if I basically liked it because it reminded me a little of men. Just a little though - I still love the scent of Old Spice but couldn’t wear it myself; I just like the scent because it reminds me of men.
There’s also a masculine defined wedge shaped jaw on men (not all men square jawed) that stands out a masculine extreme (many variations but the two extremes are squared and wedge). The wedge - the brow being very large and then the jaw sharpening to a point; one trans NWO reseacher described it as “The Joker”; it’s a masculine face without roundness, softness of women. The picture she showed was appealingly masculine; a man with those strong features laughing hard (pleasingly masculine and not “pretty”)
I do remember years ago when Hollywood and modeling advertising etc. shoved our society pretty hard toward “women” by claiming to empower women, reducing the focus on the “standard of beauty” which they themselves created in the first place. They showed “women” with heavy brows not plucked or shaped, thin lips etc. Women dont’ need to pluck their brows or insert silicone in their lips to look feminine (it’s the overall package that does that) so this went over well with the public tired of impossible or heavily made up beauty standards.
But now I think they were always as driven to idolize impossible, fake standards - they were just preparing us to accept trans women by elevating “differentness” so that if you saw a masculine looking model, you could reason, well, Aunt Helen does have a square jaw too and she’s adorable!” You must “let” advertisers keep you thinking only classically feminine looking women are attractive you know!
Around that time, women’s magazines featured a few women’s advocates telling readers things like, “You don’t understand, today’s models represent the appearance of less than 1% of American women! You can’t buy make up to look like they do - they are exotic, rare!” What they didn’t say, is these aren’t actually women.
There were also eye opening videos created utilizing real women models to show how Photoshop can exaggerate and reduce features to where the start and finish picture do not look like the same person. Large eyes are believed to be an instual signal to draw a desire to protect in men and women (infants have large eyes, as so many baby animals). Those videos made a positive impression on women re real life expectations, and at the same time opened the door to accepting “new” standards of beauty that would encompass male “women”.
Here’s one of those videos:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYhCn0jf46U
Apparently, men’s eyes are naturally larger, so that helps trans “women”, but they require alot of work to reduce the deep set, heavy browed look (surgery and makeup). That’s why a common eyebrow style arches unnaturally high in advertising and on celebrities.
Trans “women” can’t have eyebrows that trace or approximately the natural brow bone because it looks too masculine. So trans “women” draw eye brows up and over the brow ridge (make the viewers eye follow the drawn arch, not the natural brows growing along the heavy brow bone). Since this became prevalent in advertising, many real women adopted this unnaturally arched design even though it doesn’t look right one the softer brow of a genetic females.
Women becoming characterless of themselves, pushing for body fat ratios seen in advertising but not on real women, lament that their hips don’t look like any of the popular models, they lost their “pre baby” figure unlike all those movie stars and models etc.
Makeup advertising drove the push for large-eyed makeup. But between photoshopping of real women to make their eyes appear up to 20% larger (and necks much longer), and employing trans “women” in advertising; real women and men are constantly exposed to advertisements featuring “women”/women with eyes larger than those found in the real world. Both sexes become indoctrinated to find real women less interesting to look at then advertised women.
Creating desire for “men” who aren’t men, “women” who aren’t women, and physical standards that don’t exist (i.e., rippling abs on women and for that matter, men!). Women staying home to raise families made to feel like “professional failures” etc. Natural men being portrayed as unfeeling, narcissistic aggressive brutes. What would life be without the perversion of the Satanists?
I think you inadvertently misquoted me, L.J.
I never said Pence is “Loyal to Trump,” though he may be at this point.
And Pompeo is certainly NOT A NEOCON. Whoever said that is badly misinformed. Pompeo clashed with the actual neocon, John Bolton, and Pompeo was instrumental in reducing U.S. military presence in Syria as well as couselling restraint in U.S. dealings with N.K. and Iran—both decidedly NOT NEOCON positions.
I just wanted to set the record straight since your post appeared (incorrectly) to be quoting me.
Strangely Satanic - encouraging people to seek their comforts - the sexes are being encouraged not to tolerate natural differences in men and women because they don’t have to; men can socialize with “women” who look them over with an sexually aggressive glance and women can socialize with “men” whom they find understand (prioritize) so much of women’s concerns and are not aggressive or threatening.
********************************************************
Viva la difference!
Disestablishmentarian: Not what I find attractive.
The Dao Te Jing (which I do NOT find incompatible with my Christianity) describes the true power of women best, I think, in comparing it to the ocean which receives and absorbs the waters of a mighty river (the male or yang principle).
Which is more powerful, the raging river which fills the ocean, or the ocean into which it ultimately loses itself?
Yin and yang are different yet inseparable.
Anyway, I do not prefer (in terms of attraction) women who mimic the masculine
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes. I am overgeneralizing and had in mind the indoctrination that young males grow up with now, as opposed to mature men and/or men who came of age in another time.
VERY GOOD VIDEO BY WEBB
1. There is a video of Randy Credico wandering around a press event drunk & “bragging”, “I am the back channel to Wikileaks”. Well ... Stone was just convicted of saying that Credico had told him that but that he was lying.
2. There is reportedly a video of Credico saying, “I played Roger Stone” - this sounds like the same setup as other Mule op things - they got Credico to say he was backchannel, did this trip to London, etc., all for the purpose of setting up Stone. Webb is adamant, “this tape exists”
3. Rick Gates lied in Stone trial and then changed his testimony before Senate Intel. Committee.
Doutzen Kroes reminds me of a young Denise Richards or a young Brad Pitt.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I also think of Nicollete Sheridan, who had a unique look that made quite a splash as a blond bombshell decades ago but has changed with age:
https://www.thesmokinggun.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/670xX/photos/darylhannah.jpg
Rally tonight in CO. RSBN’s feed is still all screwed up, I’m watching Fox 10 in Phoenix’s feed, good quality audio and video. Pence is speaking now. DJT should be up in an hour or so.
-SB
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This one?
Q!!Hs1Jq13jV61 Feb 2020 - 12:22:32 PM
81ecd413a6257b9282949a61ea7edc87a710fcfa7cd3f480431facc458bf8de7.jpg
BREAKING TONIGHT: Agency That Handles White House, Trump's Private Communications Suffers Massive Data Breach: Report >> https://t.co/ggUi2ZfKOV pic.twitter.com/t5x5VC2QBd— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) February 20, 2020
Yes. Thanks for posting it. Not sure if it’s connected to the recent post. Just noticing things.
My apology, Dis - I should have not been lazy, and gone back and quoted what I was replying to, which you were replying to...sorry! It was a comment by MNDude, to which you replied.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3817338/posts?page=894#894
. Check this out. If those letters are real, it looks like Ryan and Pence we’re plotting to assassinate Trump.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I was quoting from the link!! That should teach me....
you’re welcome!
That security guy is really chatty and having fun.
No worries.
Winning.
It was incredible’: 100-year-old WWII veteran, son speak about viral moment at Trump rally
WHAT???
Here’s story that the tweet links to, I’ll copy part of it:
(Breaking 9/11 links to this story):
U.S. agency responsible for Trump’s secure communication suffered data breach: letter
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. defense agency responsible for secure White House communications said Social Security numbers and other personal data in its network may have been compromised, according to a letter seen by Reuters on Thursday that was sent to individuals whose data may have been taken.
The letter, dated Feb. 11, 2020, says that between May and July 2019, personal data may have been compromised “in a data breach” on a system hosted by the Defense Information Systems Agency.
The agency says it “provides direct telecommunications and IT support to the president, vice president, their staff, and the U.S. Secret Service.”
More at link
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
