Posted on 01/30/2020 9:08:36 PM PST by ransomnote
It's about SAM ELLIOT...and his mustache and his non-dancing horse.
It was the doritos commercial, Just loved Sam and the horse
Ukraine wants larger compensation for its citizens killed in plane shootdown in Iran
https://www.yahoo.com/news/ukraine-wants-larger-compensation-citizens-194405649.html
If I’d had money to bet I would have made a fortune. Q said ‘trust Kansas’ after all and we are ‘watching a movie’. It was too perfect San Fran vs Kansas I mean come’on. The ‘oh they’re losing’ in the 3rd quarter was a replay of impeachment in my mind as I was listening to it on the radio while driving this evening.
In the impeachment trial of Prez Andrew Johnson in the 1860's, one senator was running opposed to Johnson for the WH - he recused himself in the final vote to acquit. So there is precedent.
Of course today's 'rats are not bound by any rules except their own, which they make up for each occasion.
Iranians must have ‘right to choose’ at polls: Rouhani
https://news.yahoo.com/iranians-must-choose-polls-rouhani-115644057.html
Maybe so, but in this case, McConnell and the GOP run the Senate.
Here... X 2.
If that were so the whole House thing would have been thrown out immediately as illegitimate and unconstitutional. Now Q has posted that POTUS will appeal the whole thing to SCOTUS to nullify it. True the 'rats only came close to their latest Kavanaugh hearing circus; it should never have gotten even close.
As an allusion (I believe) to what people outside the Q world think of as a conspiracy theory, one scene has Sharon Tate wearing a shirt with number on it. Seventeen, of course.
I asked Mrs. AZL if she had noticed what number was on Tate's shirt. She said she didn't notice a number.
gisd O
Hill - arious!
49ers’ Richard Sherman on White House visit: ‘I doubt it’
Bwahahaha!
I’m not really sure that Bolton’s true motives or allegiances are really known at the moment. When Bolton first came on board, Q implied that he was there to clean house. Bolton is mentioned in three Q posts - 993, 1123, and 1603. The first two deal with Bolton being tasked to clean house. The last one talks about him meeting with Putin and how that represents the failure of the cabal to stoke conflict between U.S. and Russia.
It’s at least conceivable that this latest rift between Bolton and Trump is disinfo - a staged squabble in the same vein as Trump’s public quarrel with Sessions. To what end it might serve, I don’t claim to know, but there’s a lot about the plan that is still hidden from me.
It’s true that Bolton has been hawkish in the past, but that doesn’t necessarily mean he’s a neo-con. There are those who, although too quick to seize upon the military option, are motivated by patriotism and a desire to protect American interests. Then there are those who want to entangle us in foreign wars where the national interest is tenuous at best.
Neo-cons refers to interventionists who use ‘spreading democracy’ as their rationale and claim that in the long run doing so serves the national interest. In reality most of them are likely globalists who use the ‘spreading democracy’ rationale as a cover. Bolton has been an interventionist in the past, but he’s also been very critical of the U.N. in the past - which is a very anti-globalist position to have.
Ping
He's not going.
OH MY GOSH...best meme of the year!!! ROFLOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.