Posted on 01/18/2020 8:29:38 AM PST by BenLurkin
Whats not to love about whizzkids streamlining your responsibilities for running services, optimising efficiency and keeping citizens safe into a bunch of fun apps?
Theres no concrete definition of a smart city, but high-tech versions promise to use cameras and sensors to monitor everyone and everything, from bins to bridges, and use the resulting data to help the city run smoothly. One high-profile proposal by Googles sister company... to give 12 acres of Toronto a smart makeover is facing a massive backlash. In September, an independent report called the plans frustratingly abstract; in turn US tech investor Roger McNamee warned Google cant be trusted with such data, calling the project surveillance capitalism.
Shoshanna Saxe of the University of Toronto has highlighted. Smart cities, she wrote in the New York Times in July, will be exceedingly complex to manage, with all sorts of unpredictable vulnerabilities. Tech products age fast: what happens when the sensors fail? And can cities afford expensive new teams of tech staff, as well as keeping the ground workers theyll still need? If smart data identifies a road that needs paving, she writes, it still needs people to show up with asphalt and a steamroller.
We can rewild our urban landscapes, and apply low-tech ecological solutions to drainage, wastewater processing, flood survival, local agriculture and pollution that have worked for indigenous peoples for thousands of years, with no need for electronic sensors, computer servers or extra IT support.
Not only can functioning wetlands defend cities against floods and restore nature, they can clean wastewater. And they can do it more efficiently than sewage-treatment works all while absorbing a whole lot of carbon, nitrogen, sulphur and methane, and creating a fishing industry and fertile farmland. No water, energy, treatment chemicals or fish feed required.
(Excerpt) Read more at theguardian.com ...
I, for one, welcome our new Google overlords.
You say that like it’s a BAD thing...
And we only need to reduce human population to a historic level of 100 million. The survivors can stack the skulls of the dead between outbreaks of cholera and the plague.
Gotta keep tabs on the serfs , its for the best.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.