Posted on 12/06/2019 9:06:00 AM PST by ransomnote
Verbatim podcast of the new IG Horowitz Report, as read by yours truly: first installment to be released Monday.
For updates and further information on how to access this recording:https://t.co/9ZLQzDPAGf
&@AP_Scoop— Adam Baldwin (@AdamBaldwin) December 7, 2019
BREAKING: @AdamBaldwin the actor who starred in “Full Metal Jacket” will perform a dramatic reading of the Inspector General's report outlining the origins of the FBI’s investigation into the Trump campaign >> https://t.co/KSlo2mYX9O
VIDEO: https://t.co/X8GHdagYKs pic.twitter.com/XQAlvZqtd6— The Ann and Phelim Scoop (@AP_Scoop) December 6, 2019
for later
#226 rumor has it 3 Saudis were recording the shooting as it happened
If true every Saudi on a military base needs to be immediately escorted by armed security to a plane that takes them back to S.A.
Enough of their crap!
“We all are appreciative...but” you have an objection and wish to talk for everyone here...
Are you talking about the President? Or someone else? (Not specified) Cleared of what? Cleared by Whom? (Questions from a Sunday morning talk show!)
Why are you making this Ransom’s problem and demanding that she answer it.
If YOU—along with the media and talking heads—think he has to “clear his name” you need to define what in your mind is necessary to so.
WHAAAaaaa??? That’s so cool.
For updates and further information on how to access this recording:https://t.co/9ZLQzDPAGf
Actually to me Adm. Rogers looks better now - put on a little weight, looks healthier.
Good Saudis, including their King to be, are on real America and Trump’s side.
Bad Saudis are on the side of the derps, like they were before the new king took over.
The derps want their Saudi back. This shooting was a derp move to separate Trump from the good Saudis, protect derp Iran, and of course, a diversion from Trump’s frontal assault on all things derp.
Just another chess move in the big game. The expected response beyond the trees from the programmed blue pillers who don’t have a clue.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yup.
Still looks like he doesnt sleep much. But do agree he looks better and seems more at ease.
Press Releases
Share
December 06, 2019 | Judicial Watch
Judicial Watch: Court Rejects FBI Effort to Keep Secret Records about FBI-Clinton Lawyer Meeting on Russia
Updated 12/6/14, 4:38 pm
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg denied a Justice Department effort to block the release of any communications between former FBI General Counsel James Baker and Michael Sussmann, a Perkins Coie law partner and former DOJ attorney, who reportedly met with Baker to share information targeting Donald J. Trump during the presidential campaign. While at Perkins Coie, Sussmann represented the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Hillary Clinton’s campaign during the time Perkins Coie secretly paid for the development of the anti-Trump dossier the DOJ used to obtain FISA warrants to spy on the Trump campaign. The court specifically rejected the FBI’s argument that it needed to protect the “privacy” of Hillary Clinton’s lawyer.
Baker testified before the House Judiciary and Oversight Committees that he received documents as well as computer storage devices on Russian hacking from Sussmann. The Mueller report, however, concluded that there was no evidence that the Trump campaign improperly colluded with Russia.
In March 2019, Judicial Watch filed suit after the FBI failed to respond to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request dated October 5, 2018 (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:19-cv-00573)). The lawsuit seeks:
Any and all records of communication between former FBI General Counsel James Baker and former Department of Justice attorney and current Perkins Coie Partner Michael Sussmann.
Any and all records created in preparation for, during, and/or pursuant to any meeting between Mr. Baker and Mr. Sussmann.
Any and all calendars, agendas, or similar records, either in paper or electronic format, documenting the schedule and activities of Mr. Baker.
The FBI would neither confirm nor deny the existence of records. Judicial Watch successfully argued that:
[T]he sworn testimony of Baker, the former FBI general counsel, confirms that Sussmann was sharing the same documents with the media.… Rather than privacy, this confirms that Sussmann was seeking to obtain attention for his activities. Hence, this is far from a typical case … Sussmann had no expectation of ‘personal privacy,’ as he was actively seeking publicity for himself and the information he wanted to share.
In any event, the public interest in disclosure of the existence of records is manifest.
Judge Boasberg ruled:
“[A]ny risk of invasion [of privacy] evaporated once Baker publicly testified that he had received documents from Sussmann, as well as met with and spoken to him on multiple occasions in 2016.”
In October, Baker testified before the U.S. House Judiciary and Oversight committees in October 2018, where Baker stated: “It was like — my recollection was it was a stack of material I don’t know maybe a quarter inch half inch thick something like that clipped together, and then I believe there was some type of electronic media, as well, a disk or something.”
In his testimony Baker acknowledged that Sussmann’s information related to the FBI’s Trump–Russia investigation. He also testified that Sussmann had shared the same information with the media, stating that Sussmann had told him “some elements of the press had this information as well and were going to publish something about it.”
In August, another federal court judge rejected FBI efforts to protect of the privacy of Clinton spy Christopher Steele and ordered the FBI to conduct a search for certain records about Steele’s work with the FBI during the Mueller investigation.
“The FBI is corruptly trying to keep secret documents to protect those behind the Russiagate smears of President Trump,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “Two federal courts have now rejected the FBI’s desperate attempts to hide the details of its anti-Trump conspiracy with Hillary Clinton’s Fusion GPS-FBI spy operation. Why is Director Wray allowing the corrupt cover up the FBI’s Russiagate collusions with the Clinton gang?”
Judicial Watch previously obtained heavily redacted copies of FISA warrants used by the Obama-era DOJ to spy on the Trump campaign, which seem to confirm the FBI and DOJ misled the courts in withholding the material information that Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the DNC were behind the “intelligence” used to persuade the courts to approve the FISA warrants that targeted the Trump team. One of the FISA warrant renewals was granted in June 2017 and did not expire until September 2017, some eight months after President Trump assumed office.
###
Who’s name, softengine?
"We brought together the best intelligence, the best cyber operators, and the best strategy and plans in cyberspace operations to ensure we could thwart any adversary that was trying to conduct malign influence against our U.S. elections," VADM Myers said.https://t.co/w6KaZVqg3x— @U.S.CyberCommand (@US_CYBERCOM) December 6, 2019
Conservatives Sue California for Failing to Keep Non-Citizens off Voter Rollshttps://t.co/fc440HC3f5https://t.co/OdCHEEAU1thttps://t.co/LaNegEKMF6
And Thanks to Judicial Watch Lawsuit Settlement - California Begins Massive Voter Roll Clean-Uphttps://t.co/SDGkCS5etE— World News Extra (@worldnewsextra) December 7, 2019
"blue pillers"
Kek!
no shenanigans ?
mark
**
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.