[SteveH]

Well, it should still be rule of law unless war is officially declared... or so i would imagine under our constitution... i might be missing something... and if Q selectively voids the constitution then he/she is advocating what in its place... anarchy? if so, what is the difference between anarchy and living in caves? i would part company there with Q if that is what Q had stated earlier. However, I do not know enough about Q to know if that is what Q meant earlier, one way or another... (will try to keep an open mind about all of this, but only up to a point...)

[Chuckster]

There are a lot of gaps in your knowledge, apparently. I surmise you are new at this Q thing. There is a lot to take in but the whole reason for Q is to facilitate an orderly transition out of the corruptocracy bringing justice and the rule of law without causing undue chaos.

i.e. The Great Awakening, now in progress.

[AllAmericanGirl44]

Ignore that posters ramblings, it’s way way way off track!
There is no evidence to suggest Q had a dang thing to do with Epstein and certainly less than no evidence that our President did! Sheesh