Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MeganC
Autistic children should not be sent to a public school that is not equipped to handle them.

The definition of "autistic" has been expanded so far that large numbers of children who would have been considered normal 40 years ago, are now labled "autistic".

I suspect I might have been labeled "autistic" back them. I was very focused, did not develop good social skills early, got bored easily...

Maybe labeled Asberger's today.

26 posted on 09/19/2019 2:18:45 PM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: marktwain; MeganC

“Autistic children should not be sent to a public school that is not equipped to handle them.”

I would drop the first word. Then the statement is true for all kids be they blind, deaf, etc. The school needs to determine which kids it can handle in a regular classroom and which it can’t. Then figure out how to handle the remainders. As marktwain noted, autistic includes a broad band of behavior. Think of labeling both blind kids and kids with glasses, blind.

As I side note, I think it would be better to split schools by sex. They are different enough that separation would be better for both.


27 posted on 09/19/2019 2:41:42 PM PDT by alternatives? (Why have an army if there are no borders?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson