Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Monrose72

RBG’s comments are a good sign. If Roberts was siding with the libs, I don’t think RBG would have described the ruling as sharply divided. She would have called it a “bipartisan consensus” or something.


4 posted on 06/16/2019 10:38:49 AM PDT by arista
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: arista

Just before the Obamacare ruling, Ginsburg said something about “taxing”, hinting that the Obama care mandatory penalty would be ruled as a “tax.” I don’t remember her saying something about a lot of 5-4 decisions then. If she mentioned 5-4 decisions now, it means she is on the losing side of 5-4 decisions this summer. We shouldn’t jump to conclusions that it means she lost on the census question.


5 posted on 06/16/2019 10:44:38 AM PDT by convoter2016
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: arista

I got that impression too. It seemed odd for her to make those recent comments about split decisions. I too figured the liberals were on the losing side of some key cases.

Some may not know, but the opinions are already decided. But it takes time for the justices to write their opinions, so they don’t publicly disclose outcomes when they initially vote in private on the cases. So Ginsburg knows what’s coming down, but is not really at liberty to talk about it in detail.


6 posted on 06/16/2019 10:46:43 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: arista

I used to think he sided with the libs because of his adopted kids but they’re adults now so what gives?


18 posted on 06/16/2019 2:12:39 PM PDT by bgill (when you badmouth women, you are badmouthing your mama and the good women on FR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson