We could tattoo their necks too... Demon-crats gotta eat I guess....
Then if you find some missing kid you can just take them to the nearest animal hospital.
If a microchip can be implanted, it can be removed as well.
What’s that old saying? For every measure, there is a counter-measure.
https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/immigration/item/32219-migrants-now-renting-children-to-stay-in-u-s-knowing-families-get-to-stay
“Migrants” Now Renting Children To Stay in U.S., Knowing “Families” Get To Stay
...
https://www.oann.com/illegal-immigration-surges-to-110k-aliens-renting-children-to-cross/
The latest immigration numbers for April are in, with the Border Patrol
revealing nearly 110,000 illegal aliens were apprehended or denied at
the border last month. Illegals are now “renting” children in their
efforts to cross the border.
No, don’t think so. How about just don’t let them in the first time?
If it’s good enough for fur kids,
it’s good enough for our kids.
That is what the blacks did in the 60s when welfare was started.
I say no to microchip.
Yes to DNA, fingerprint & photograph
We could tattoo their necks too... Demon-crats gotta eat I guess....
Good idea. More humane than tattooing a barcode on their ass.
But there’s no need really, we already have good biometric identification methods, starting with the good old fingerprint and going up to retinal and facial recognition.
We have the technology, we’re just not using it. Because rassist I suppose...
The cartels will just dig them out or chop off their arms where the RFID chip is.
You’ll have sex traffickers carving those chips out of crying children with box cutters. That’s a NO vote from me. I understand your frustration, but no, it won’t work.
This would make a good pilot program for when the Democrats try to chip all of us.
Microchip em’?
I can see A LOT of problems being solved overnight with such a system in place. Crime will go down significantly believe it or not.
Scripture also states what the real nefarious reason will be when this is actually implemented.
Hitler made the mistake of Id’ing just the Jews. The next Hitler will ID his own people - a loyalty mark. Without out it - you’re dead.
Here’s a better one. Put a sign at the boarder with a ruler going to 72” high that says “You must be at least this tall to cross enter over the border!” 97% of everyone instantly disqualified, and no anchor childeren! If Disney can discriminate based upon height, so can we!
Biometrics are all that is needed.
Fingerprints, photos and retinal scans would do the trick.
Yes to all. Very, very frustrated here. If they can and will do all those other things, if we can afford it by the hundreds of thousands, that would be just great. No, I don’t want to treat people like animals -— but it appears they are being bought and sold by their parents and others now already. I want a tool to get them back home to hopefully loving parents ASAP if they are kidnapped or are being used by the cartels. Just trying to figure out something, anything that can make it STOP!!!
I am of the opinion that Iris capture is a better biometric device.
The only problem I can see with this is that cartels and smugglers will take them out, and for as much as they love to drug the northerners, they won’t be so kind with the children. Even if it’s placed somewhere dangerous, like near the brain stem, they’ll be more than willing to take the risk.