Posted on 05/04/2019 7:50:29 AM PDT by SleeperCatcher
Devin Nunes may only represent a small portion of Californians, but he’s done more for all Americans than just about any other congressman in regards to uncovering the seemingly endless layers of deceit, lies, obfuscation, and skullduggery regarding the deep state coup attempt against POTUS Donald Trump.
On Friday, Nunes continued his quest to expose the guilty with a demand for documents from the NSA, CIA, State Department, and the FBI regarding an operative named Joseph Mifsud after casting doubts on conclusions about his role contained in special counsel Robert Mueller’s report.
(Excerpt) Read more at thenationalsentinel.com ...
Mueller lied in his report, more than once.
All of the above were involved in Obama's weaponized coup against candidate Trump and then President elect Trump.
No wonder the liberals in Congress, the media and Obama's thugs don't want us to use the word spying to describe their criminal activities against Donald Trump.
Call it Obama's SpyGate!
Obama Spied on Trump — And the Drive-Bys Covered It Up
Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | May 3, 2019 | Rush Limbaugh
NO! Let’s not call it “Spygate”
“Spying” is merely a means to an end, a tool. The end was treason, conspiracy, and sedition to overthrow a duly elected government. Those are capital offenses.
Maybe “spying” is easier for the uninformed voter to understand, but it seriously diminishes the severity of the true crimes committed.
Just an aside:
It’s too bad this is all too late for WKRP (for Les Messman) and Mary Tyler Moore Show (with Ted Knight) to have to read a news story:
Amy Klochubar, Pete Buttigieg and Rashida Tlaib said they dispute the GOP statements on Peter Strzok and Joseph Mifsud.
One time Johnny Fever asked Nessman to pronounce the Mexican town which is also the name of a tiny short haired dog:
“Cheee-hooah-hooah” was the reply.
Amy Klochubar, Pete Buttigieg and Rashida Tlaib
Name 3 misfit nutjobs you wouldn’t allow near your children, or pet.
Maybe “spying” is easier for the uninformed voter to understand!"
The independent and probably uninformed voters will probably decide the 2020 election.
They don't spend hours on FR debating/nuancing what to call spying on a Presidential Candidate.
They call it spying.
Look at how the left wingers in Congress and their mediots went ballistic when AG Barr called it spying. Their focus groups understood what Spying was.
Last but not least, Rush Limbaugh has a great handle on what to label tricks/stunts/crimes of the left, as shown below:
Obama Spied on Trump — And the Drive-Bys Covered It Up
Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | May 3, 2019 | Rush Limbaugh
shumer even threatened Trump with the intelligence agencies. He knew what was going on.
$humcker even threatened Trump with the intelligence agencies. He knew what was going on.
Pelosi probably did in private with Trump the candidate and Trump Elected and Trump the president.
If Mueller is such a rat, why didn’t he come out and say Trump was guilt of obstruction then, when he had the perfect opportunity and his entire team wanted it?+
Mueller made the call, and he didn’t do it.
Nunes was the first one the Clinton/Barak cabal trashed with his accusations.
I have no doubt you are right and it will be called something that is easy for the great unwashed to understand. That is probably the correct strategy.
This thing is SO deep, SO complicated, has SO many players and the tentacles are SO deep and pervasive that it’s almost impossible to understand everything that went on. It seems to have had many different objectives, too.
So simplifying it is essential to get any traction. But “spying” seems too trivial and too easily dismissed.
Of course, the original “second rate burglary” was easy to dismiss, too.
Mueller made the call, and he didn’t do it.
Probably because he wants to stay out of prison.
I’m not a big contributor to political causes, but the next time I get a solicitation from the RNC, I’m writing back and telling them my $ will be gong directly to a select few, like Nunes, Meadows, Jordan. And Tom Fitton, at Judicial Watch.
Not a cent that could possibly wind up in Mitt’s mitts...
A big motivation behind promoting universal suffrage was the intentional dilution of critical knowledge, maturity and decision skills. Manipulated by a controlled media that enjoyed total information superiority, the result is the obvious voter ignorance we see today.
Now, the question is, how do you prepare a people who have been locked into an artificial environment to accept the traditional cathartic process steps that necessarily follow a civil war?
Let us consider the most economically advanced and politically stable countries, including the last time a major government/political system was challenged and/or changed:
- US - 1865
- UK - 1688
- USSR - 1992
- Spain - 1936 - Germany, Japan, Italy, France - 1945
- China - 1949
In each of these instances, significant percentages of the native populations died. 5, 10, 15+% are considered the norms. And, as we can see from the list, it's not ancient, medieval history either. No, in fact just as recent as 27 years ago in Russia.
So let's go back to my original point above: how to prepare and condition the US people for what needs to be done to the conspirators? This is the real key - at this point we're so far beyond re-stating factual components that patriots need to consider how to (en)force the issue as to capital punishment.
Consider Trump just started using the term "treason" in his tweets. What really needs to happen is for conservative social media to begin the process of preparing 'normals' about traditional measures utilized to enforce law & protect legitimate government.
Or alive!
A defense of Mueller makes it impossible for your clique to break away from the conspiracy niche.
The video is fascinating and appears to confirm suspicions about “Crossfire Hurricane” - they weren’t taking one or two shots at this, they pulled out ALL the stops and ran MANY spies at the campaign.
> why didn’t he come out and say Trump was guilt of obstruction then
Probably didn’t want to get stabbed in the streets. If Mueller had declared obstruction of a non-crime as a method of removing a lawfully elected President, Civil War II would already be hot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.